Shameless religious fraud linked to blood of the Pope

The Roman Catholics adore and kiss the tapped blood of the late Pope.

Father Thaddeus M. Bocianowski holds up a first class relic containing a drop of the blood of the late Pope.

Father Thaddeus M. Bocianowski, pastor of St. Stanislaus Parish in Buffalo, holds a recently received relic of “Blessed John Paul II”. The relic currently rests before a statue of the late pope.

 The relic, a drop of Blessed John Paul’s blood, is currently displayed in front of a statue of the man himself just in front of the pews.

Source: Western New York Catholic.

Lets read what the BBC recorded about the blood of the late Pope.

 Blood taken from Pope John Paul II before he died is to go on display at his beatification on Sunday.

One of four small vials of blood removed from John Paul during his final days will be used, the Vatican said in a statement. The Polish pontiff is to be beatified at a ceremony celebrated by his successor, Pope Benedict XVI.

 Pope John Paul II, whose papacy lasted 27 years, died on 2 April 2005 after battling Parkinson’s disease.

Source: The BBC

My comment:

The spiritual prostitution and religious fraud will reached its nadir just before the return of the Messiah Jesus of Nazareth.

A Catholic in Krakow in Poland bow under the altar to kiss the container with the blood of the late Pope.

There is no end of the shameful and damnable fraud in the Vatican. The above picture has the following recorded picture-text:

 Central altar with the relic of John Paul II’s blood in a glass case


Polish girls in national dresses carry a container with “holy blood” of the Pope on their shoulders. Cursed by their parents, and cursed by wicked priests.
A Roman Catholic priest bow before the container with “holy blood”.
The present Pope kiss the container with tapped blood of the late Pope.
Fraud linked to minting of money and religious indulgences is a never ending story in Rome. Here is hair cut from the dying Pope.

 A close-up view of the relic of Blessed John Paul II. The reliquary contains hair from the late John Paul II, who was beatified on May 1, in St. Peter’s Square by Pope Benedict XVI.

Even before the late Pope has been canonized, the priesthood of Satan leads the faithful Catholics into pure witchcraft. Like Satanists tap blood from slaughtered chicken to worship spirits, Catholic priests use the tapped blood of the Pope for “spiritual purposes”. Roman Catholic Bishops tapped blood from the deceased and dying Pope.

All men who are not completely wicked can understand the idolatry of bowing down under an altar, to kiss a container with blooded taped from a sick old man.

To declare this kind of blood  “holy” will provoke the Holy Father God in Heaven to anger. It is not difficult to understand that Roman Catholics are told that suffering physical illness is something noble and “holy”. Because they will all be brought to the bed of sufferings, and finally to the eternal fire of Hell.

What they are told to do by their priests is nothing but “first class” blasphemy.  Their distasteful rituals is based on doctrines made by demons, followed by men who hate God of the Bible.  The Cardinals, Bishops and priests of Rome are whitewashed tombs and brood of viper’s.

Only the blood of Jesus is Holy. If you want to live, you must never accept or acknowledge the extreme evil of the Vatican, and present it as a part of the Christian family.

 1 John 1:7
But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.

The Church Reformers called the Pope in Rome for an antichrist. They were right. Nothing has changed under the sun for the last 500 years.

Have you become an antichrist too, defending Satan’s Church?

Read more about the scam linked to the blood of the Pope:

Here is a link to the arrival of the blood in Columbia.

First published March 2nd, 2012.

Written by Ivar

23 thoughts on “Shameless religious fraud linked to blood of the Pope

Add yours

  1. Ivar wrote:

    “Have you become an antichrist too, defending Satan’s Church?”

    Shalom Ivar,
    you should ask this question yourself.
    Please do not be angry with me but in some of your comments on your web-site you use the term: “God the Son” which is totally unscriptural.

    Most surely you know the “Shmah Israel”: “Hear O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD!” (Adonai Elohenu Adonai Echad)

    The term “God the Son” is not written one single time in the Bible. Always “Son of God”.

    May I ask you here also a question:
    How were you baptised?
    Perhaps in the tri-une magic occult witchcraft formula: “In the Name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost?”

    What is the Name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost? The answer is: The LORD Jesus Christ (Acts 2:38 a.o.)

    Are you defending the trinity and the water baptism in the tri-une formula which are the two pillars of the Roman church?

    Be like Samson: Pull these two pillars down, even if you will die with it.

    “Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye recieve not of her plagues.”

    “He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.”


    P.S.: I did not want to hurt you Ivar, perhaps you are one of the 144.000 virgins. May be it will wake up some of the readers of your web-site. I just could not remain silent any longer. Please forgive me.

    1. Dear Shalom.


      I will not get angry on you. This is a website for free expression about faith.

      There is some limits. Jew-hat will not be tolerated. Obviously not people who throw spells and curses, and not at all filthy language.


      1. There is nothing FREE about a Christians expression about their faith, Jesus paid a high price for us, as well as you, HE has labored 24/7 for our walk out of darkness into His glorious light. Oh no dear, this is not a FREE site, it is a blessing that one of His opens a place for you and us all to talk about how we feel and believes costs, in many ways, Time, prayer, obedience to The Lord of Glory…so that all can come and drink of the fountain within us all..for all who are so loved by The Glorious Savior Jesus Christ!

    2. Dear Shalom.


      You wrote:

      May I ask you here also a question:
      How were you baptised?
      Perhaps in the tri-une magic occult witchcraft formula: “In the Name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost?”

      My reply:

      Please do not call the Biblical New testament Baptism for an “occult witchcraft formula”.

      Are you a Oneness Pentecostal, from the sect “Jesus only”?

      Please confirm.

      1. You wrote:
        Please do not call the Biblical New testament Baptism for an “occult witchcraft formula”.

        My reply:
        Mt. 28:19 is the absolute truth and so is Acts 2:38. There is no contradiction in the Scriptures. It is so simple like mathematics. 3×3=9. You can not just repeat 3×3=3×3. You must give the answer which is 9 (The Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost is the LORD Jesus Christ)
        There is only “one LORD, one faith, one baptism.” (Eph. 4:5)
        We only need to understand God’s Word the right way. Satan has misused and misinterpreted the Word of God, right from the beginning. If it were possible he would even deceive the elect.

        You wrote:
        Are you a Oneness Pentecostal, from the sect “Jesus only?

        My reply:
        No, I’m not.

        They are also daughters of her mother, just like all the other denominations.

        The Bible says it like this:
        “Mystery, Babylon the great, the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth.”

        “Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye seperate, saith the LORD, and touch not the unclean thing, and I will receive you. And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the LORD Almighty”.


      2. Dear Shalom.

        Sabbath Shalom.

        Please confirm:

        1. Do you believe Yeshua is God?

        2. Have you been baptized?

        3. If yes. In which name?

        Love and grace.

  2. Mt. 28:19 is very, very controversial. A lot of scholars say it should not be there, probably inserted by early catholics.
    I was baptized in the name of my Lord Jesus Christ… everyone else in the Book of Acts.

    1. Dear Steveair.


      You wrote:

      I was baptized in the name of my Lord Jesus Christ… everyone else in the Book of Acts.

      My comment:

      Do you also have a Father God in Heaven, who is the father of the begotten Son?

      1. Dear Roger.


        You wrote:


        My comment:

        Jesus nailed our failure to obey the Law to the cross. He did not nail the Law. He is the lawgiver, and the Law is righteous and good. All of them, around 630 of them.

        There is a huge misunderstanding around what Paul says about the Law. The law is not a curse, set by Jesus on the people He lovers. This kind of non sense talk makes Jesus a user of spells and curses. He is not.

        To be under the Law is a curse, from the moment there is a better covenant. The New covenant is a better deal for mankind. There is no longer a need for blood sacrifices. Jesus became the passover lamb, who was slaughtered for our justification. No longer can the blood of animals take away the stains and guilt of sins, and justify any human being.

      2. I had your name as ivarfjeld, now you sound like Philip…….. Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father, and we will be satisfied.”
        Jesus replied, “Have I been with you all this time, Philip, and yet you still don’t know who I am? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father! So why are you asking me to show him to you?”8

    1. very powerful stuff in this blog. So much hate. Interpretation is not everything. We will all know the truth one day. There is no right interpretation no matter how much scripture you know, it is how you live your life and treat others that will count when we are judged. Make no mistake about it, we will all be judged.

      1. How do you ‘Interpret a STOP Sign???????”
        The Word of God says what He means and means what He says! So many foolish foolish people…

        But then many ‘do interpret a Stop Sign’….that’s why there are so many Wrecks! just like there are so many Deceived…by those who ‘Interpret The Word of God to suit their own self instead of believing what HE says !

  3. That is sick, there is only one holy blood and the is the blood of Jesus Christ. What is wrong with that catholic people?

  4. As always Ivar, you always find some real nuggets of information,
    God bless You brother..

    Hope I havent offended you somehow, havent had any comments from you for a while..

    1. Dear spookchristian


      You have not offended me. Just that I have been busy with other matters that the blog, and less active in commenting.

      May Jesus the Messiah bless you.

      1. Thx Ivarfjeld…
        should have realised that you were very busy.
        Really chuffed that you messaged me,…always good to hear from a christian Brother.
        Ive reblogged as many of your posts, that I can find Ivar…

        Keep up the excellent work.

        God Bless you.

  5. Shocking. Absolutely shocking. How the Catholic church can claim this is “holy” is beyond me. This is disgusting.

  6. “He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.” (Revelation 3:5)

    Here Christ is speaking after his ascension back to heaven. He states that He will confess the name of the overcomer before His Father. If, in Heaven, He still speaks of His confessing men before His Father (and If He is the Father) He will be confessing before Himself?

    The Bible speaks of God as being The Father, The Son AND The Holy Ghost/Spirit.

    Around A.D. 190, Theodotus of Byzantium advocated the absolute personality of God. Asserting that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were one person, he sought to propagate his views in the church at Rome. He is said to be “the first representative of Dynamistic Monarchianism whose views have been recorded” (Newman 1931, 198).

    In the 3rd Century Sabellius of Libya maintained that God is uni-personal and that the names Father, Son, and Holy Ghost merely designate the same person in different capacities. As the Father, God created the world; as the Son, he redeemed it; as the Holy Ghost, he sanctifies the elect. These three, he said, are no more different persons than the body, soul, and spirit of man are three persons (Sanford 1910, 827).

    The first time that the word, “Trinity” is used to describe God was in the writings of one Theophilus, a Bishop of Antioch. In Theophilus to Antolycus Book II, 15 he says: “in Like manner also the three days which were before the luminaries are types of the Trinity, of God and His Word, and His Wisdom.” The use of this word “Trinity” implies that it was already in use and understood.

    Tertullian of North Africa also uses the term. In “Against Praxeus”, II he wrote:

    “…in the case of this heresy, which supposes itself to possess the pure truth, in thinking that one cannot believe in One Only God in any other way than by saying that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are the very selfsame person. As if in this way also One were not All, in that All are of One, by unity (that is) of substance; while the mystery of the dispensation (economy) is still guarded which distributes the Unity into a Trinity, placing in their order the three, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: three, however, not in condition, but in aspect; yet of one substance, but in form; not in power, but of one power, inasmuch as He is one God, from Whom these degrees and forms and aspects are reckoned, under the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.”

    Both Theodotus and Tertullian sought to define the nature of the Godhead. Both were contemporaries and both were around in the latter part of the 2nd Century and early part of the 3rd. They are both considered to be Ante-Nicean church Fathers.

    These men were writing at a time when there was no formal theology concerning the Godhead. To accuse these men of paganism is an injustice.

    Critics of the doctrine of Tri-unity attempt to point out that 1+1+1=3. Proponents of the Tri-unity point out that 1x1x1=1.

    The Bible leaves us in no doubt that all three (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) are one God contrary to the teaching of Arius who rejected the Deity of the Son and that of the Holy Spirit.

    Part of the problem is the fact that in the Gospels we see the Son limited to time and space in human form, yet at the same time we see the Holy Spirit descending upon Him in the form of a dove and a voice from heaven speaking of Him as being, “My beloved Son.” Here we have a clear instance of the three existing at the same time as three distinct personalities yet no one would say these were three gods!

    Then we have the problem of the relationship between the Father and the Son. The Son prays the Father. Some would argue that this is because the humanity of Christ is distinct from the Deity, that on these occasions Christ is speaking as a man. If Christ is fully human and fully God then whenever He speaks it is both as God AND man, otherwise Christ is then partly God and partly human which would make Him a demi-god (definitely a pagan idea)!

    Christ commanded the disciples baptise people in “the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit” and the disciples Baptised “in the name of Jesus.” In 1913, after hearing a sermon by R.E. McAlister concerning Baptism being in the name of Jesus, a young minister by the name of John G. Schaepe felt moved to pray and read the Bible all night. At some point he claimed to have received a revelation that the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit was “Lord Jesus Christ”. Thus was born the Oneness Pentecostal Movement which soon gave birth to several schisms.

    Probably the most well-known of these Anti-Trinitarian preachers was William Branham who went as far as to state that Trinitarian doctrine was “of the devil”! In the present, although not always understood by a number of Pentecostals, is the ministry of T.D. Jakes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: