If possible President Mitt Romany falls away, the USA might get their second Roman Catholic in the Oval office: Paul Rayan.
His budget plan has drawn fire from some Catholic bishops for cutting programs that help the poor. Conservative leader Deal W. Hudson on what the GOP ticket needs to do.
With the choice of Paul Ryan as Romney’s running mate, the 2012 presidential election will be the first in U.S. history with a Roman Catholic on both sides of the ballot.
The contrast between the Catholicism of Vice President Joe Biden and Congressman Ryan perfectly represents the ongoing debate about the Catholic vote going back to the Reagan years.
Source: The daily best.com
Paul Ryan, a lifetime Catholic and former altar boy, has always had his religious beliefs influence his ideological positions.
The selection of Ryan, only the second Catholic ever nominated for national office by Republicans, all but guarantees a fierce election-year fight for the affections of Catholic voters — or more specifically, white Catholics, who form the bulk of the Catholic vote here in this corner of Iowa and across the Rust Belt.
Source: The Martinez report
My comment:
Who do you want for President in the USA?
A semi-Muslim of a Mormon?
If you are not sure, the choice for Vice President is easy. Both the candidates are Roman Catholics.
If you are disappointed, that there are no evangelical Christian candidates, I have two advices for you:
First: Please read the book of Daniel, and ask your self what kind of season we are in. Should Christians expect to take political control of the USA, in our days, when the power of the “Holy people” are supposed to become completely broken?
Daniel 12:7
The man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, lifted his right hand and his left hand toward heaven, and I heard him swear by him who lives forever, saying, “It will be for a time, times and half a time. When the power of the holy people has been finally broken, all these things will be completed.”
Would you like to sit in the hot seat in Washington?
Second: Tell me about the Evangelical convictions of men like Ronald Reagan?
He accepted Roman Catholics as Christians. In 1984 Reagan recognized the Vatican statehood, and sent US diplomats to support the Papacy. Reagan was the first US President who ignored that this state was formed based on an agreement between the Pope and Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini in 1929.
What about Jimmy Carter. He was supposed to be a reformed brother of us, a committed Southern Baptist?
He calls the Hamas a suitable “peace partner” for Israel, a freedom movement. Carter also brand Israel as an “occupier of Gaza”, and other areas he claim the Jews have stolen from the “Palestinians”
Does it really matter who is the President of the USA?
Do you feel seeking influence in politics will make a difference, or are you called to go and proclaim the gospel?
Written by Ivar
ivarfjeld.com 
Proclaim the Gospel for a certainty. My wife and I discussed that the fix was in already 8 years ago and it continues the same. In the little time we have we need to proclaim loudly that Jesus the Christ was, is and ever shall be, King of kings and Lord of lords.
Amen!!
Ivar
Greetings and peace
You certainly have a way of bringing things out,and I totally agree with you.
Neither side will bring truth to the table. But the Republicans will cause far less abortions than the Democrats, and if you’re only offered those two choices, that’s the reason I go Republican.
I completly agree that neither side will bring truth. One thing bout your comment on abortions is that the president does not control the abortions or the lack there of. In order to stop the abortions we need to elect a totally pro life congress. No president would chaange that sadly enough.
So it’s easier to live with a Deadly Snake in the house and you don’t know when or where it will strike next? than to live with a Deadly Snake in the house and you don’t know when or where it will strike next?