Pope wants unity around the Petrine Magisterium

The Pope claim the new covenant is based on the promise of a Chair of Peter placed in Rome.

The Pope sits in the chair of Ceasar, who claim to be the replacement of Jupiter on Earth.

Dwelling upon the Gospel passage in which Peter proclaims Jesus to be “the Christ, the Son of the living God,” the Pope explored the significance of Christ’s response that Peter would be “the rock” upon which the Church was built.

The Pope made his remarks in his homily for the Mass of the Solemnity of the Chair of St. Peter.

The Pope explained how the old covenant between God and the Jewish people was first made with Abraham, of whom the Prophet Isaiah writes, “look to the rock from which you were hewn … look to Abraham your father.”

Therefore, just as Abraham “the father of believers” is seen as “the rock that supports creation,” so too is Peter the basis for a new covenant. He is “the rock that is to prevail against the destructive forces of evil.”

He described it as an “enormous bronze throne that seems to hover in mid air, but in reality is supported by the four statues of the great Fathers of the Church from East and West.” Above it, he noted, are “triumphant angles suspended in the air” and the “glory of the Holy Spirit” depicted in the oval window above. Given today’s feast, the sculpture was adorned with 144 burning candles.

Pope Benedict proposed that the statue “represents a vision of the essence of the Church and the place within the Church of the Petrine Magisterium.”

The Church “is like a window, the place where God draws near to us, where he comes towards our world,” where God “reaches” us and where we “set off” towards him, the Pope explained.

Inside the magnificent bronze throne is a wooden chair which was thought for many centuries to have belonged to St. Peter himself but was later discovered to be a 9th century gift to the Pope from the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles the Bald.

“Saint Peter’s chair, we could say, is the throne of truth which takes its origin from Christ’s commission after the confession at Caesarea Philippi,” said Pope Benedict.

“Whoever believes in Jesus Christ and enters into the dynamic of love that finds its source in the Eucharist,” he stated, “discovers true joy and becomes capable in turn of living according to the logic of this gift.”

Source: CNA

My comment:

Lets keep the damnable blasphemy of the Eucharist aside in this article.

Roman Catholic Petrine theology makes a mockery of the Jewish apostle Peter.

 On 29 June, the feast of St. Peter, the statue is clothed with an amice, alb, tiara, stole, red cope and a ring so that it practically seems to come to life. Fine marble, Sicilian jasper, green porphyry and the “marble of St. Peter” decorate the pedestal.

A statue of Jupiter in the Vatican, blaspheming and mocking a Jew named Peter.

Demonized priests inside the Vatican literally dress up a piece of black stone, and put a golden stone on its head. The statue looks like the pagan roman “god” of Jupiter,  and literally is this pagan idol.

Who made this claimed Apostle black?

A black statue which the Vatican claim is the apostle Peter, before the dressing done by the priests.

The King of Tyre was honored in this way, Lucifer.

 Ezekiel 28:12-15
“Son of man, take up a lament concerning the king of Tyre and say to him:

‘This is what the Sovereign LORD says:
“‘You were the seal of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.

You were in Eden, the garden of God; 
every precious stone adorned you:

carnelian, chrysolite and emerald, 
topaz, onyx and jasper, 
lapis lazuli, turquoise and beryl.

Your settings and mountings were made of gold; 
on the day you were created they were prepared.

You were anointed as a guardian cherub, 
for so I ordained you. 
You were on the holy mount of God; you walked among the fiery stones.

 You were blameless in your ways 
from the day you were created till wickedness was found in you.

(end of scripture)

The whole Petrine theology is based on the falsification of both the true faith and history.

Peter is not the replacement of Jesus on Earth. Peter the apostle is not the rock of our faith. Jesus the Messiah is the rock of our faith.

The Holy Spirit is the replacement of Jesus on Earth, and is made available to all believers.

This is no historical evidence at all that Peter even was in Rome. Paul was in Rome, and Paul wrote the letter to the believers in Rome. Paul did not even mentioned the name of Peter, not even once in the letters to the Romans. Strange if Peter was supposed to be appointed the first Bishop of Rome.

The Pope is Pontifex Maximus, hailed like Caesar and sits in the throne of Jupiter expressed on this coin.
The Pope is Pontifex Maximus, the sucessor of Caesar, not any Jew.  A blasphemous title for a lawless man.
Caesar took the title Pontifax Maximus, the holy father of the Roman religion.

The truth is that the Pope is the replacement of Caesar, the emperor of Rome. Like the Pope, Caesar claimed to be “gods” man on Earth, the representative of the pagan god Jupiter.

 2 Thessalonians 2:4
He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.

I am sure Peter the Jewish apostle could not have imagined that a claimed “church” would fill his legacy with worldly filth, idolatry and blasphemies. The Vatican honors Lucifer in the name of “Jesus”, the mother of all blasphemies against the Messiah and his true apostles.

First published 22nd of February, 2012.

Written by Ivar

10 thoughts on “Pope wants unity around the Petrine Magisterium

Add yours

    1. Herbert Armstrong was a liar and a false prophet. He believed that God the Father is the ruler of the universe, second in command is Jesus Christ, who is subordinate, and third under Jesus Christ was Herbert W. Armstrong himself. This delusional man thought he was part of the “trinity” and the reincarnation of Elijah.

      You are deceived, Timothy and are spreading lies.

      Read more:
      http://hwarmstrong.com/armstrongism.htm

  1. Denise,

    Catholic theology teaches that the communion bread turns into the actual body of Jesus, and the wine, His true blood. They say His body, blood, soul and divinity is contained in the bread. They say the bread no longer exists after the priest prays over it, only His body is present. This is called Eucharist.

      1. Dear Denise

        Shalom.

        The Eucharist is blasphemy against the passover. Rome would like us to believe the Jews drank the blood of the lamb, before they applied it over the door.

        Rome teach, that Jesus pointed towards the passover blood and said, this passover blood is my blood. Drink it.

        The Bible says: “Keep on drinking the passover, but from now on take the cup in REMEMBRANCE of the Messiah, the Great I am”.

      2. Hi Ivar,
        Tell JM that I think I found a proof text that may support his gap theroy. Hosea 6:1-2, Come and let us return to the Lord; For He has torn, but He will heal us; He has stricken, but He will bind us up. After two days He will revive us; On the third day He will raise us up, That we may live in His sight. Applying the year for a day would result in 2 thousand years for the 2 days. With the destruction of the second temple in 70 AD and the begining of the disapora, untill the rebirth of Israel in 1948 equals 1,978 years, and jews are continuing to return, to this day. We are not exactly sure in which year Yeshua died, but I believe that the temple was destroyed approxamately 40 years after Yeshua’s death. This would bring it well with in the 2days or 2 thousand years from Yeshua’s first coming, until now. This would mean that we are into the 3rd day now.
        I disagree with Jm’s method, I think that it is very dangerous to add a rapture of the church into a time frame based on the fact that the church is not mentioned beyond a certain point. Building a theology on what is not there is dangerous. G’d says “do not add or take away from My words.
        Please tell me is you think my post is too convoluted, but then again, what can you expect from a convolute?

Leave a reply to Denise Cancel reply

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑