Military cue in Egypt bad news for Hamas

The Islamic Arab terror organization Hamas is losing its most substantial ally, one that gave it vital political support.

Withe the removal of Muhammad Morsi, the Hamas has lost an brother in arms. — Withe the removal of Muhammad Morsi, the Hamas and Ishmail Hanyeth has lost an brother in arms.

The Military cue in Egypt is a victory for young revolutionaries, but not for democracy. Egypt might be heading into a cycle of violence with regional implications.

The statement issued Wednesday evening by Egypt’s Defense Minister Abdel Fattah al-Sisi confirmed the expectations of the last few days: the army, backed by the masses, had carried out a coup.

Yes, tens of millions had taken to the streets in recent days, illustrating just how badly the majority of the population wanted to see president Mohammed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood out of office. But Morsi was installed just a year ago, having been democratically elected. And he was overthrown by the military.

But for Hamas, the news out of Cairo Wednesday night was especially grim. The Palestinian organization is losing its most substantial ally, one that gave it vital political support. The Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas’s parent organization and in many ways its “Godfather,” lost its power to a military establishment that is hostile to the Palestinian group’s goals.

Hamas, which has clashed with Syria and Iran over the course of the last year, now finds itself nearly isolated in the Arab sphere. Perhaps the new reality in which it finds itself will lead the weakened Hamas to conclude its reunification with Fatah.

Source: The Times of Israel

My comment:

The new military dictatorship in Egypt, have implications on the security situation in the Middle East.

Like: The Basher al-Assad regime has got a little bit of fresh air. Syria is no longer the lone secular military dictatorship, among Israel neighbors.

Why should NATO fight a dictatorship in Damascus, and not in Cairo?

Also the Israeli Government would rather have military rule in Cairo, than to face an extreme and not predictable Islamic republic.

In this way, both Syria and Israel silently rejoices over the ouster of the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood. Now its back to “normal”, and the Status Quo that has brought peace since 1973, can continue.

It is not the military rulers in Syria and Egypt that has brought instability to the Middle East. Is the irresponsible Western support of Islamic terror-organizations like the PLO, the Hamas, the Hizb”Allah, Islamic Jihad and the Muslim Brotherhood.

At the end of the road, the Muslims will have to establish a peace agreement between the major sunni and shia sects. It might be easier to establish this “peace deal” with military rulers in place in Cairo, Damascus and Iran. When this deal is done, they will agree to fight their common enemy. The Jewish presence in the Middle East, Zionist Israel.

Therefore: A renews military dictatorship in Cairo, will only give the Jewish state a temporary, not lasting feeling of security.

Written by Ivar

July 5, 2013 1

Both Muslims and Christians tried to «liberate» Vienna in 1683

Islam has twice invaded Christian Europe. In 1683 the Ottoman Empire tried to «liberate» the city of Vienna. Or is it more correct to say that the city was liberated from an Islamic siege and occupation?

The third Islamic invasion of Europe is going on as we speak

The question of liberation or occupation is seldom about land. Its most likely a question about values. Its also a question about ideology and faith.

Few Europeans are aware that Islam was close to take over the Austrian capital of Vienna as late as the year of 1683. The Muslim army that attacked central Europa through the Balkans, was obviously portraying them self as «freedom fighters». They came to «liberate» Central Europe.

The Christians in Vienna did not want to be «liberated» by the Muslims. They looked on the Islamic forces as hostile. They represented a real threat of an unwanted Islamic occupation.

The Jews that lives in Judea and Samaria today feels the same way.

They do not want to be liberated by Islam. They feel that a two-state-solution will bring their freedom to and end, and the two Jewish districts will be given back to the previous Islamic occupiers.

Why do I use the term «Islamic occupation»?

Because before the liberation of Judea and Samaria in 1967, the two districts were under Islamic occupation. Even from 1917 to 1948 the land was free from Islamic oppression, controlled by the United Kingdom. The Britishers had «liberated» the land from an «occupation» by the Ottoman Empire that had lasted 400 years.

Today, the European Union wants to put the liberated Jewish settlers back under the same yoke of Islam, it self was fighting to be liberated from in 1683.

Since the city of Vienna needed to be protected from the threat of an Ottoman Islamic occupation, why should the same forces be allowed to reign over the Jewish homeland?

Is it the Jews or the Muslims who have liberated people in the Middle East, and particular inside the state of Israel?

The Ottoman control of Judea and Samaria has to be branded as an Islamic occupation, Likewise the Jordanian control over Judea and Samaria from 1948 to 1967.

People fight wars to either liberate others, or to get rid of their own occupation. After the six day war in 1967, Judea and Samaria was liberated. Still, most of the Biblical heartland of Israel is free from occupation. But the International community has already forced Israel to give some of the liberated Jewish land back to its previous occupiers.

First Published, September 11th, 2009.

Written by Ivar

July 5, 2013 0

Obama and Islam in need of “peace talks” before September

US secretary of state wants Obama to get some fresh credit before the UN General Assembly resumes its debate over the Middle East in September.

John Kerry accept Islamic "peace plans" with open arms. Here in Kuwait. — John Kerry has been told by his boss s to accept Islamic “peace plans” with open arms. Here in Kuwait.

John Kerry said Wednesday in Kuwait that progress toward a Middle East peace agreement needed to be made before the UN General Assembly resumes its debate over the Middle East in September.

Kerry stressed that he was not setting a firm deadline for resuming peace talks, but said,

“Long before September we need to be showing some kind of progress in some way.”

Gold disagree

“Almost everybody who’s been professionally involved in the peace process does not believe that a permanent status agreement is possible at this time,” cautioned Dore Gold, a former Israeli negotiator and aide to Netanyahu who is now president of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.

“What is needed is a new paradigm in order to make this work, but there’s no indication that any new ideas are surfacing.”

Source: New York Times

My comment:

We all understand that Barack Hussein Obama desire to get some credit as “peace maker” when he is going to address the UN.

The US will be seated with Ambassadors for Islamic dictatorship around the Middle East and in Asia, some of them solid buyers of US Treasury bonds. They all expept to get something back from their brother is arms, to see the possible destruction of Israel at hand.

For all reflecting and honest people, there is a question mark:

How can Israel negotiate about anything, with bandits and terror organizations that do not even accept that the Jewish state exist?

How many Muslim nations permit’s Israeli civil airliners to, even fly over their air space?

Because racism against Jews, Israel is even banned from joining the Asian football cup’s, and must play with European nations. Thank God of the Bible that there are still civilized people around.

Till the day the Arabs accept defeat in Israel’s war of independence of 1948, there seems to be little to talk about. Forget about agreeing on anything.

Under pressure from the International community, that can not discern right from wrong, Israel needs to keep playing the present political theater. Netanyahu and his cabinet needs to pretend that there is some Arabs, that really are willing to accept a Jewish statehood. And keep on searching for them.

Written by Ivar

June 28, 2013 1

Mac Donald’s boycotts Ariel but loves Saudi Arabia

McDonald’s has turned from a business into an organization with an anti- Israeli political agenda,” senior settler leader says.

The Saudis can enjoy a burger, regardless of the crimes committed by the regime.

“McDonald’s has turned from a business into an organization with an anti- Israeli political agenda,” said Yigal Delmonti, deputy director of the Council of Jewish Communities of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip.

“We expect that Israeli citizens, especially those living in Judea and Samaria, will take this into account before entering the company’s franchises.”

He added that “we welcome Burger Ranch’s announcement that it would open a branch in Ariel, a move that will increase its visibility throughout Israel.”

Source: Jerusalem Post

My comment:

Mac Donald’s have mo moral scruples selling hamburgers to people living inside the totalitarian Islamic Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

But refuse to sell burgers to Jews in the free and democratic township of Ariel in Samaria.

Now doubt that the Saudi nationals might stop buying US Treasury bonds, if they see Jews in Ariel get proper burgers. Today to be a proper American business entrepreneur, you need to be a dhimmi under Islam.

Another issue, is that when Mac Donald’s can sell burgers in Tel Aviv, and not in Ariel, the multinational company basically says that Ariel must be demolished, or Jewish properties handed over to Arabs. This is not a nice message to send to Israel, whom you pretend that you love and support.

Islamic Jihad and the PLO can enjoy som American fried chicken in Ramallah. — Islamic Jihad and the PLO can enjoy some American fried chicken in Ramallah.

By the way: Its possible to get both KFC and Pizza from Pizza Hut in Ramallah.

So why not burgers in Ariel?

Both places are located on the so-called “West bank”.

There seems to be an “burger apartheid” going on, where there is an ongoing discrimination against Jews living in Samaria. Hypocrites, hypocrites and nothing but American hypocrisy. May Jesus the Messiah have mercy on all deceived souls.

Written by Ivar

June 28, 2013 6