– Syria expose Obama’s support of al Qaeda

The plan for a military campaign demonstrate that the U.S. is fighting on the same side as Al Qaeda against the Syrian regime.

Norwegian senior journalist Odd Karsten Tveit in one of his moments of truth.

These are the words of Odd Kartsten Tveit, a secular Norwegian senior journalist who has worked with Middle East Issues for more than 30 years.

This is recorded by Norwegian media:

If the U.S. goes to attack Syria will be the first time in history that an American president is on the same side as Al Qaeda.

Earlier, in Afghanistan, Americans contented themselves with equipping extreme Islamists with weapons to fight a common enemy. It was once the enemy the Soviet Union.

Of course, Americans do not agree that they are on the same side as those who attacked the United States for almost exactly 12 years ago, 11 September 2001.

There are other ironies. Unmanned U.S. doner kill Al Qaeda people in Yemen and Pakistan. In addition, many civilians lose their lives in these attacks.

But Syria is Al Qaeda’s twin, Al-Nurse-front, material help of America’s allies. Al-Nurse-front is one of many groups that will remove Assad. If they all have a common goal, they disagree about what should happen next in the country.

Source: Norwegian state TV, NRK

My comment:

Let me underline that Odd Karstein Tveit is notorious for his support of Arab forces, during their wars with Israel. Still I acknowledge that in regards to the conflict in Syria, he has drawn the correct conclusion.

Obama is not a Christian. He is born by a Muslim father. The not converted US Commander in Chief, consider Islam to be the “religion of peace”. No true Christian will ever utter such words.

Osama Bin Laden was born in Saudi Arabia, into a family of Sunny Muslims. That 11 of the 12 attackers on September 11th 2001 were Saudis, did not result in a US military attack to punish the regime in Riyadh.

Washington today, seems convinced that the Shia supported regime in Damascus, must be punished for the crimes done by Syrians, using nerve gas on their own brethren.

Such a response is not logical, and can be compared to the US onslaught on Afghanistan, while continuing to support Saudi Arabia.

Lets take a look at some pictures, that display the reason behind the absence of common sense and logic.

George W. Bush could not attack his Order brother, the king of the Saudis.

Bush and his order brother walking hand in hand.

For George W. Bush it was simply not possible to attack Saudi Arabia. Not only did the US import 20 per cent of its oil supplies from the Saudis. The Islamic King of Saudi Arabia is an Order brother of W. Bush, who already had gifted the US President with an Islamic Order medal.

Barack Hussein honored by Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud.

In regards to Barach Hussein Obama, his support for al-Quade is neither based on convenience, nor by bribes, like in the case of W. Bush. Obama is convinced that his Sunni Muslim brothers, are fighting for “allah”. Obama feel he silently support a noble cause, and desire to bring an end to the Islamic civil by the use of the supreme military powers of NATO.

The majority of people in the secular west have turned to hedonism, and live a life in self indulgences and denial of the truth. If the West were still connected to reason, there would be a massive revolt in protest of this kind of misuse of NATO. But since the Islamic threat has been imported to Europe too, the cowards remain silent. If there is any logic, the logic seems to be: As long as the bombs keep on falling in my neighbors garden, no need to worry.

Written by Ivar

August 29, 2013 5

Washington supported and armed the Taliban

Ronald Reagen invited the Taliban to the White House in 1985. Jimmy Carter supplied Jihad with Stinger rockets and US dollars.

Reagan — The leaders of the Islamic mujahidin in Afghanistan was invited to the White House in 1985.

It is amazing how naive many Christians are in regards to Islam. May Christians have no knowledge about the CIA and the White House, being the first sponsors of the Taliban.

When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979, Moscow wanted to remove Islamic oppression from Kabul, and replace this evil with secular communist values and ideas.

Washington did not agree. To avoid Afghanistan becoming a Communist state, the CIA was given the order to support Islamic militants. The logic was:

It would be better for the Afghan people to be under the rule of “Allah” and the White House, than to serve Moscow.

What are the fruits of this US Foreign policy doctrine?

One evil seems to have replaced the other.

alg_taliban-soldiers — Taliban with American made Stinger rockets inside Afghanistan.

Washington was not alone in recognizing the Taliban as a political and military force. The US had Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the UEA as their main allies.

Lets take a look what Wikipedia has recorded:

The Taliban, alternative spelling Taleban,[4] (طالبان ṭālibān, meaning “students” in Arabic) is an Islamist militia group that ruled large parts of Afghanistan from September 1996 onwards. Although in control of Afghanistan’s capital (Kabul) and most of the country for five years, the Taliban’s Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan gained diplomatic recognition from only three states: Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.

Source: Wikipedia.

When Ronald Reagan invited the Taliban to a reception in the White House in 1985, He just acknowledge the work of the previous administration of Jimmy Carter.

BrzezinskTaliban — Zbigniew Brzezenski supplying ISI, the Pakistani CIA, with weapons. The same criiminals that put Osama Bin Laden in a safe house for six years.

Carters National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezenski had secured delivery of the most modern US anti-Aircraft to the Taliban, Stinger Missiles. These missiles were used to shoot down Russian Military helicopters, and eventually made it impossible for Russia to win the War.

This is information from an Independent source:

Former National Security Adviser under the Carter Administration, Zbigniew Brzezenski, has admitted that an American operation to infiltrate Afghanistan was launched long before Russia sent in its troops on 27 December 1979. Agence France Press reported that: “Despite formal denials, the United States launched a covert operation to bolster anti-Communist guerrillas in Afghanistan at least six months before the 1979 Soviet invasion of the country, according to a former top US official.”[2]

Brzezenski stated that “We actually did provide some support to the Mujahedeen before the invasion.”[3] “We did not push the Russians into invading, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.” He also bragged: “That secret operation was an excellent idea. The effect was to draw the Russians into the Afghan trap.”[4]

Source: MediaMonitors.net

300px-Obama_Taliban — Welcome to Afghanistan, Uncle Sam.

The US has a legacy of creating evil, that eventually starts to disobey Washington and attack America.

Support of men like Mubarak and Gaddafi and in its most perverted form, US support of Osama Bin Laden.

Its called failed American Imperialism, and it has looted several trillions of the US tax-payers hard earned savings.

Will we soon see the end of this evil?

Only if America goes bankrupt. The rule of the US dollar will one day end, and be replaced by a One World Currency, and a One World Government.

Those who are filled with the spirit of anti-Christ will hail the coming of the final anti-Christ. He will rule the One World unity Religion.

Jesus the Messiah must reign in our hearts. If we reject Him, the wrath of God will not pass over us. The wrath of God will be succeeded by the Return of the Messiah. He will return to judge the Word with all its evil, idol worship and wickedness.

Mind my words.

Written by Ivar

May 14, 2011 2

Obama chose selected US Senators to see Osama

US Senator Jim Inhofe said today he had no doubt Osama bin Laden was dead after viewing pictures of the terror leader’s body.

osama_bin_laden_wanted_poster — The dead wild men out west were displayed, to warn others not to face the sheriffs bullet.

The CIA has begun showing the photographs to some US lawmakers after President Barack Obama said they were too gruesome to be released to the public.

Mr Inhofe, a Republican, said he was shown 15 photographs taken after Bin Laden was killed on May 2 in a US commando raid.

There are 12 photos from the Pakistani compound and three from the ship where they buried him at sea.

“Yeah, they are gruesome because they were taken right after the incident,” Mr Inhofe said on FOX News.

“I couldn’t tell whether the bullet went through the ear and out the eye cavity or through the eye and out the ear because a lot of brains were draped out from the socket. But it clearly – what we saw there was it was him. There’s no question it was him.”

Source: Herald Sun

My comment:

I have no doubt that the pictures of a claimed dead Bin Laden must display the ugly face of war.

But I do not buy the explanation, why this is a valid reason not to publish them.

Today, the White House would not have published any pictures from Hiroshima. If they could block the publishing of such pictures.

Pictures of the Holocaust would also, only, have been shown to come few selected US Senators, to avoid the World being alarmed.

Do anyone still buy the White House version of the death of Bin Laden?

It is true that the US has spent 2 trillion USD to get Bin Laden, and we all understand that Obama would like to keep the truth about him for his selected people. But the US spent some money to blow up Hiroshima too, and we were all able to see the damage done.

The Holocaust was also a costly affair. A whole new Industry in Germany was built to exterminate six million Jews. And few people had any objections.

If you have forgotten, let these pictures remind you:

Dear bodies in Hiroshima, not promoted for display by the White House.

hiro1 — Killed by a special US Operation in Hiroshima.

Hiro3 — Killed by the US Government, burnt alive in Hiroshima.

The pictures of the Holocaust has been seen all over the World. And should be shown in all Schools all over the Planet.

HOLOCAUST-2corpses — They died as a result of a campaign, backed by a new Industry in Germany.

holocaust4 — To tough for the White House. Most likely not to be displayed by Obama and other Muslims, to save the Americans for a gruesome picture?

Barack Hussein Obama must learn from the past. I wounder if he will deny the Holocaust on the next press briefing in Washington?

May 13, 2011 11

No proof provided of the death of Osama

The U.S. government did not immediately release any photographs or other visual evidence to confirm the death.

President Obama claims Osama is dead. But no proff has been provided.

A senior U.S. intelligence official said bin Laden was “visually identified” at the compound by U.S. Special Operations Forces and by one of his wives.

On Monday morning, U.S. officials completed tests that showed a “virtually 100 percent match of the body” with DNA collected from other bin Laden family members.

US officials declined to say whether an autopsy was conducted.

Analysts predicted that al-Qaeda itself would soon confirm bin Laden’s death, as the network customarily has within short order after other top leaders have been killed. They said it was likely that bin Laden had pre-recorded a video or audio message that would now be released.

Source: The Washington Post

My comment:

When Saddam Hussein was captured, the Pentagon quickly published photos confirming his arrest.

Why is there no picture of the dead body of Osama Bin Laden?

Let us say that Washington became aware that Bin Laden is already dead of kidney failure.

If so, the al-Quada would never admit that their icon leader has died. And the US could never provide evidence, that they had been able to kill the man they have spent 2 trillion US dollar to silence.

To kill an already dead man, and dump a corpse in the sea, would be a unique publicity stunt for the White House. Who would ever be able to prove them wrong?

Only if Osama Bin Laden appear on TV, and prove that He is still alive…

I guess if Washington has hundred per cent secure evidence that Osama has died of kidley failure, the risk of him appearing on TV alive is zero. And who will now believe al-quada, if they claim Osama Bin Laden died long ago?

Will we ever come to know the truth?

Written by Ivar

May 3, 2011 18