A popular «man of peace» will bring the final war on Israel

President Barack Obama is expected to bring peace. But having no base in the truth on issues like Jerusalem, Israel and the Jewish people, the «peace» that he brings will be the preparation for the final war.

Brack Hussein Obama will try to bring a false peace up on Israel and the Jewish people
Obama is a winner of the Nobel prize of peace, used for preparation of the last and final war.

10th of September 2009: Many people will say: «Obama talk about peace. Lets support him». That is a dangerous statement when we are talking about the leader of the most powerful nation on Earth.

Lets suppose Obama is not a nice man, a pretender that is seeking glory and fame for him self. If so, Obama is not the first World leader with dubious motives for his words and actions.

Adolf Hitler was a man of words, and was carrying a great vision of peace. But he was a hypocrite, and five million German´s paid the ultimate price for trusting the German leader. 60 million people died at the end of the «peace process» Hitler started.

Barak Obama has do be judged both on his words, abilities and his merits. Lets take a closer look:

Merits:

The merits of a leader that has been in power for less than a year will never be impressive. There is still US soldiers involved in two wars, in Iraq and Afghanistan. If the Nobel peace price committee had chosen the price and award winner based on merits, Obama could not have got any price before the end of these two wars.

Abilities:

Obama might not have the ability to bring peace. Because a peaceful solution in Iraq, does no not hang on the Americans. Iraq is crippled by a civil war between Sunni and Shiite Muslims. In Afghanistan, peace is a matter between the National Government and Al Quaeda. Like in Iraq, an American withdrawal will not bring an end to Al Quaeda and their Radical Islamic agenda.

Words:

Since Obama now has both spoken about «peace» and got a peace prize, he will have to bring into the arena whatever peace he can get. In regards to Israel, a peaceful solution that does not demand an Arab recognition of the state of Israel, will both on words, ability and merits become a false peace. The continued American denial of Jerusalem as the capital if Israel, is words of fake and falsehood. To talk about «peace» without telling the truth about Israel, Jerusalem and the Jewish people will in the end of every peace process bring war.

Obama will only be able to bring a «false peace». And when the Jewish people have been forced to sign this «peace agreement», the Jewish nation has walked into the final trap. Now the final antichrist can come and set him self up in the Temple, and claiming to be God.

Paul the Jewish apostle explains this sad state of affairs.

1 Thessalonians 5:3
While people are saying, “Peace and safety,” destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape.

The final destruction will come when the true Messiah enters into Jerusalem. First we shall see him in the clouds of Heaven, coming with full power and glory. Than He shall touch down on the Month of Olives in Jerusalem, and bring an end to the antichrist and all his children.

Behold. With this peace price the trap set up for Israel and the final battle is coming closer.

Luke 19:42

and said, “If you, even you, had only known on this day what would bring you peace—but now it is hidden from your eyes.

John 14:27
Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid.

Brethren, Jews and gentiles. Put your trust in Jesus the Messiah, who has payed the price for all sins. Soon He will come and bring Judgment on the World.

Written by Ivar

First published: 10.09.09.

Roman Catholics control the US Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court is made up of six Roman Catholics, two Jews and Justice Stevens.

The US Supreme court has a majority of enemies of God of the Bible.

Professor Stone, of the University of Chicago, learned this in 2007 when he wrote an opinion article in The Chicago Tribune after the Supreme Court upheld the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act in Gonzales v. Carhart.

«Here is a painfully awkward observation: All five justices in the majority in Gonzales are Roman Catholic», Professor Stone wrote. «The four justices who are not all followed clear and settled precedent».

«Given the nature of the issue, the strength of the relevant precedent, and the inadequacy of the court’s reasoning, the question of religion», he went on, «is too obvious to ignore»

Professor Stone said he was surprised by the vehement criticism that followed. Catholics in particular, he recalled in an interview, said the religion of the justices should be off limits. One Catholic, Justice Antonin Scalia, was especially furious about the questions raised in Professor Stone’s article.

«I had been pleased and sort of proud that Americans didn’t pay attention» to religion, he said in an interview with Joan Biskupic for her recent biography of him, «American Original». «It isn’t religion that divides us anymore».

Professor Stone’s article, he said, was «a damn lie», adding that «it got me so mad that I will not appear at the University of Chicago until he is no longer on the faculty».

«Historically, religion was huge», said Professor Epstein of Northwestern. «It was up there with geography as the key factor».

There is, for instance, no official photograph of the justices from 1924. The court had to cancel its portrait that year because Justice James C. McReynolds, an anti-Semite and a racist, refused to sit next to Justice Louis D. Brandeis, the first Jewish justice. The fact that William J. Brennan Jr. was Catholic seemed to figure in President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s decision to nominate him to the court in the election year of 1956. But when Justice Abe Fortas resigned in 1969 from what was considered the «Jewish seat» President Richard M. Nixon saw no political gain from replacing him with another Jew, settling instead on Harry A. Blackmun, a Methodist.

As that progression suggests, religion, which once mattered deeply, has fallen out of the conversation. And it seems to make people uncomfortable on the rare occasions it is raised. Professor Stone said there were ways a justice’s religious affiliation could have an impact on the court. President Obama, for instance, could nominate an evangelical Christian.

Mark Tushnet, a law professor at Harvard, had another suggestion. President Obama, he said, could use Justice Stevens’s retirement as an opportunity both to honor tradition and to break new ground.

«The smartest political move,” he said, “would be to nominate an openly gay, Protestant guy».

Source: New York Times

My comment:

Does the religious conviction of the justices of the US Supreme Court matter?

Obviously. If the majority of them were Muslims, The Patriot Act would have been revoked as unconstitutional.

There were 32 declared national emergencies between 1976 and 2001 in the US. Most of these were for the purpose of restricting trade with certain foreign entities under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

When the One World Government is introduced to solve an emerging global crisis in the Great Tribulation, a papal controlled US Supreme Court will not object to a US President handing over his executive powers to the Vatican. Even today, both the Vice President and The Speaker on Capitol Hill are Roman Catholics.

The US Senate can not stop the President doing so, within the first six months of such a decision. Than a Grand Jury will be appointed by the US Supreme Court to look into the constitutional side of the matter.

First published May 3rd 2010.

Written by Ivar

The deceptive doctrine of pre-trib rapture

The New testament age begins with the martyrdom of John the Baptist. The death of John the Baptist took place when Jesus the Messiah walked in flesh on Earth.

There is not going to be a rapture before the Great Tribulation. So get ready for witness on the bumpy road ahead.
There is not going to be a rapture before the Great Tribulation. So be ready to be a witness today, and  continue on the bumpy road ahead towards heaven.

Since the Messiah demands that his followers shall be willing to give the ultimate sacrifice, no one should be surprised that the Lord did not rapture John The Baptist out of his troubles. His martyrdom stands as an example for all of us. The beheading of true witnesses have continued, and surface even in the Book of Revelation 20:4.

The martyrdom of Stephen is the second New Testament example. Standing before the religious rulers and speaking Messianic truth, Stephen was ready for the ultimate sacrifice for His Lord. No rapture.

Jesus the Messiah is blunt, when he says that all who want to save their life, will not only loose it. They will loose everything. But those who are ready to gift their life to Him, shall gain life. Paul said that it is no longer He who lives, but Christ who lives in him. Paul says death is gain. No fear of death, because death is defeated. We are all supposed to be dead to this world. The friends of this world are the enemies of God. Nothing has changed.

Paul and all the apostles were ready for the ultimate sacrifice. They all faced martyrdom, less John, who might have died a natural death.

The problem with the pre-tribe doctrine, is that the need for the ultimate sacrifice is abolished. Not only does this doctrine lack spiritual logic. It is also based on faulty teaching.

To rapture Stephen, might have left no willing witness to stand before the religious tribunal. Stephen was chosen, and he did the needful.

What should be the reason for the rapture of the most bold and truth speaking witnesses?

Neither was Jesus doing so is the past. Nor is he doing this in the present age, and why do so in the future?

We are surely not destined for Hell, and God’s eternal wrath. But we are called to witness in the midst of chaos, confusion and apocalyptic disasters. Why not?

There is no valid and logical reason for a need to rapture today’s witnesses, than that people fear death, and take pleasure in their life in the flesh. If they are willing to give the ultimate sacrifice, they will gladly enter the Great Tribulation. It will be a time for witnessing to the lost souls. Never will it be more easy to read directly from the Book of Revelation, Matthew 24 and Luke 21, and explain to people what they see and experience.

Obviously false prophets do not agree with this. That Is why they desire to bring us to silence, and ban us from preaching in Churches and Fellowships. Many have succumbed to false prophets, who have departed from the truth, and taken the road down the path of compromises.

The book of Revelation (20:4) clearly states that it is those who have been beheaded, warning others and speaking the truth, that will rule with Christ for 1000 years. Not those, who were not willing to give the ultimate sacrifice, but rather accepted the mark of the beast, and joined the persecutors of the true followers of the Messiah.

In Luke 21:25-27, you can read that even the heavenly bodies will be shaken before we shall see the Son of Man coming in the clouds of heaven.

In 2 Tess 2 you can read that the last man of Lawlessness is present, when Jesus returns to kill him.

There is no words in the Bible explaining about three comings of Jesus. There will only be two.

Hebrews 9:28

so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him.

If the last man of lawlessness is revealed after the second coming of Jesus, the whole Bible is a falsification. This will not happen. The Word of God exposes the teachers of the pre-trib doctrine as false prophets and false teachers. If you believe the Word of God, you will not accept their teaching.

You will have to make a choice.

First published Janaury 19th, 2014

Written by Ivar

UK venerates 750 years old Catholic tongue

Catholics filled Westminster Cathedral on Saturday to venerate the relics of St Anthony of Padua.

A British woman hold hands with a golden statues, and pray to a piece of rotten human flesh.
A British woman hold hands with a golden statues, and pray before a piece of rotten human flesh.

The arrival of the saint’s relics, which comprised a small piece of petrified flesh and a layer of skin from the saint’s cheek, was part of a UK tour marking the 750th anniversary of the discovery of St Anthony’s incorrupt tongue.

Following their visit to Westminster Cathedral, the relics’ tour concluded at St Peter’s Italian Church in Clerkenwell.

Bowing in religious worship before a statue of gold and a piece of flesh.
Bowing in religious worship before a statue of gold and a piece of flesh.
Roman Catholics in Stri Lanka carrying the rotten tongue on their shoulders.
Roman Catholics in Stri Lanka carrying the rotten tongue on their shoulders.

It is estimated that the relics have attracted 250,000 people across the UK during their tour.

Source: Catholic Herald

Another Roman Catholic website has published the following report on how the “Holy tongue” was recovered:

When the crypt was opened, they found that the saint’s body had been reduced to dust and bones, but his tongue was intact and life-like.

This was taken a sign from God confirming the ardent gifts of preaching and teaching that Saint Anthony had enjoyed on earth.

The claimed to be a incorrupt tongue looks more like a black stone. Or may be a piece of to mush fried bacon.
The claimed to be a incorrupt tongue looks more like a black stone. Or may be a piece of to mush fried bacon.

St. Bonaventure, who was present as minister general of the Friars Minor, took the tongue reverently into his hands and exclaimed:

“O blessed tongue, which has always blessed God and caused others to bless Him, now it appears evident how great were your merits before God!”

Source: Taylor Marshal

My comment:

Roman Catholic worship of skeletons and rotten body parts are the most morbid and grotesque form of religiosity on Earth. And the most traumatic side of this spiritual insanity, is that the worshipers claim to know “Jesus”.

Roman Catholic monks adore the skeleton of a man who died 750 years ago.
Roman Catholic monks adore the skeleton of claimed to be “Holy Antony”, a man who died 750 years ago.

They surly do, but not the true Messiah. The “Jesus” of Rome is a deadly copycat. This is not the Jesus of the Bible, who forbid his followers to worship created things, and idols of stone and wood.

Romans 1:24-26
Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves,  who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. (NKJV)

Eternal shame, agony and pain is awaiting all who present this religious fraud as a part of true Christianity.

Written by Ivar

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑