Rome returned stolen skull of St. Irene

There is a lot of drama around people who fight over skulls. One of them is St. Irene.

The skull of St.Irene was stolen by Rome, but returned to its Orthodox owners.

This is what an Greek Orthodox web site has recorded:

 “Some of the relics of St. Irene may have been stolen by the Latin Crusaders during the sack of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade of 1204”. 

Source: St. Basil the Great.

It must be said that theft done by the claimed to be holy Roman Catholic Church, is regrettable.  At the end of the story, you will see that this criminal act were revoked in 1999, and the stolen skull returned.

The problem is that the Orthodox Church, accuse the Roman Catholic Church, not only of robbing their skulls. But also to “destroying holy places”.

 “The Latin sack of Constantinople changed the “sacred physiognomy” of the city as its holy places were destroyed and desecrated, only to be partially restored when the Byzantines took back the city in 1261”.

Lets take a deeper look into this robbery.

“St. Irene was born in the city of Magedon, Persia during the fourth century, circa 310 A.D. Her Christian name Irene means peace, and she was one of the twelve Virgin Martyrs who appeared to the eighteenth century Russian ascetic St. Seraphim of Sarov and the Diveyevo nun Eupraxia on the Feast of the Annunciation in 1831”.

This kind of acts by a “saint” raised many questions.

The skull was stolen in 1204, and not returned until 1999. Still the claimed to be saint appeared among a dozen virgins, to another saint and a nun in 1831.

Did St. Irene appear with our with our her stolen skull?

If the “saint” appeared with a skull, the “saint” must have been able to find its own stolen head. And if that happened, why did not the “saint” her self return her own head back to its rightful owners already in 1831?

If the “saint” appear without its head, how did it find its way?

Could this been an example of a false miracle and sign?  Or are the involved clergy just confused or misguided?

Most likely both. There is a need to come to a conclusion:

The Vatican is not only the largest collector of bones and skulls. The Roman Catholic Church is also a grand robber of pieces of dead mans flesh. Because if they were not robbers of this skull, why return the “holy item”?

Jesus the Messiah has a short message to religious people, who fight over bones.

 Matthew 23:27
“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean.

Written by Ivar

Roman Catholic skull of the day

Cardinal Miloslav Vlk with skull of Saint Wenceslaus during a procession on September 28, 2006

The Pope bowed before this skull when he visited this place.

Lets see what Wikipedia records on this Cardinal:

 Miloslav Vlk (born 17 May 1932) is the Archbishop of Prague, and was considered a possible candidate for a new Pope to succeed John Paul II.

There are many questions than comes to my mind, when I see pictures like this:

1. When would a skull become holy, and can a skull ever loose its holiness?

2. Would the skull have been holy without the crown and the green stones?

  Revelation 9:20
The rest of mankind who were not killed by these plagues still did not repent of the work of their hands; they did not stop worshiping demons, and idols of gold, silver, bronze, stone and wood—idols that cannot see or hear or walk.

It must be said, that this skull does not appear to be able to “hear”. And since the head has been cut off from the body, it will neither be able to “walk“.

Jesus the Messiah did not approve of those who adore, venerate or worship bones and skulls. God the Son gave us a stern warning not to have such persons as our spiritual leaders.

 Matthew 23:27
“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean.

Let the dead go and bury their own dead.

Written by Ivar

Bewitched Catholics in Manila, Guatemala and Panama

A copy of El Cristo Negro is worshiped in the city of Portobelo in Panama. Another statue is feed by his students in the Philippines.

You do not have double vision. There are two black copies of Jesus in this Catholic parade in Manila.

News That Matters has focused on the spiritual foundation of the Black Madonna, back to its origin in the occult realms of voodoo.

Her black son has been copied in Catholic Churches all over the Globe.

From the city of Cologne in Germany, to Manila in the Philippines.

There are many stories among Catholics of how these crucifixes have landed up on different shores.

One legend from Panama explains that the image of “Christ” came to Portobelo aboard a sailing ship bound for Cartagena in Colombia.

Catholics pray to and bow down before El Cristo Negro, Portobelo in Panama.

When the galleon sailed from Portobelo, a fierce storm sank it. The boxed image floated free and was washed up on a nearby beach. There it was found by the towns people and taken back to Portobelo.

El Cristo Negro of Portobelo, Panama. The voodoo knife’s on his head, must have been given to him by his Haitian mother.
Faithful Catholic pilgrims crawl on their knees, to face El Cristo Negro inside the Church in Portobelo in Panama.

In the Philippines, the story is different. El Cristo Nero was bought in Mexico by a Catholic priest, carved by an Aztec carpenter. The statues was than transported by a galleon from Acapulco, and enshrined in the minor basilica in Quiapo in Manila.

A good example of how this falsehood spread from the Voodoo inflicted Caribbean, to the most distant shores in South East Asia.

The Manila version of “Jesus”, a small black Catholic copy of a statue in Mexico.
El Cristo Negro is a real crowed puller in the streets of Manila.

The appearance of El Cristo Negro in various forms, took place between the years of 1800 A.D and 1830 A.D  It was in this generation the syncretism of the Catholic religion and voodoo took place in the Caribbean.

In the city of Esquipulas in Guatemala the black copy of Jesus is surprisingly surrounded by white skinned ladies. Eventually, his mother could not have been black, as her claimed to be son.

El Cristo Negro, in the city of Esquipulas in Guatemala.
The Black Messiah of Guatemala with her white mother.

One saying trying to explain the color difference. The kisses and tears of the faithful has made the wooden statue black. Strangely enough: Despite all the tears and kisses, the white color of his mother’s statue never disappeared.

The freemasons are known for their great reverence of the occult realm.

A priest gives an order brother his reward, next to the black copy of Jesus. Pay attention to the man with the black cap. Its like the devil watching the show.

This merger of Catholicism and voodoo was blessed by the Papal system. Today this form of religion is like an explosive cocktail, beyond the possibility of repentance and repair.  Anyone who bells this kind of false Christianity, and decides to follow the true faith, will be excommunicated, ridiculed and persecuted.

Lets see what the book of revelation says:

Revelation 18:4
Then I heard another voice from heaven say: “Come out of her, my people, so that you will not share in her sins, so that you will not receive any of her plagues.

As you saw in the “Drop in Saturday” story. The late Pope never managed to leave this corrupt religion, after he approved and blessed it in Angola in 1992. Than: As promised in the Bible, the Pope was struck by her plagues.

Acceptance of this religion, will lead the worshipers into cruel bondage’s.

Written by Ivar

Vatican clerics wants rights as residents of Israel

“Catholics are not foreigners here. They are an integral part of life of the State of Israel”.  ‬‬

The Papacy has always struggled hard to get control over important buildings in Jerusalem.
The Papacy has always struggled hard to get control over important buildings in Jerusalem. Like the Temple Mount.

The Vatican cleric says of agreement that will settle outstanding taxation issues normalize Catholic presence in the country ‬.

Israel and the Catholic Church will soon sign an agreement that will regulate financial relations between them, according to senior Catholic officials in Jerusalem. Clerics say the long overdue agreement will settle outstanding taxation issues and will normalize the Catholic presence in Israel.

“The idea is to give a juridical frame and to say that Catholics are not foreigners here — they are an integral part of the life of the State of Israel,” Father Pierbattista Pizzabella, the Custos (custodian) of the Holy Land responsible for the Christian holy sites, told a group of journalists including The Media Line. “Catholics must have a clear position according to the law and international agreements.”

The Catholic Church also owns large amounts of property in Israel and there have been disputes over whether all of that property is tax-exempt.

Source: Ynetnews.com

My comment:

The Roman Catholic Church should continue to be branded as a “foreign entry” in Israel.

 Revelation 2:2

I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false.

First:  Catholicism is not the faith of the Jewish people, and it is not the faith of Christians either. It is not the original Christianity formed in the first century, but a New Age copy that was established in the years after 315 A.D in the capital of the pagan empire of Rome.

Second: The representatives of the Roman Catholic Church are not loyal to the state of Israel. They represent the Vatican statehood in Rome. Italians have always been, and should still be branded as foreigners in Israel.

Third: The Roman Catholic Church is guilty of horrible crimes against the people who lived in Israel.  Like during the crusades. What the Vatican statehood claim as their properties in Israel, are all stolen land. It was particularly stolen in the years 1099 A.D to 1291 A.D, when the Pope occupied Israel. These properties should be gifted back to the Jewish nation, and in the future be governed by Hebrew Christians.

Forth: The Roman Catholic Church do not represent Evangelical Christians. Their claim of supremacy over Christendom is built on a fabrication of Church history, and perverting Biblical truths.

So there is no need to accept any of the demands of the Vatican.

 2 Corinthians 6:14

[ Warning against idolatry ] Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?

Written by Ivar

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑