Both Muslims and Christians tried to «liberate» Vienna in 1683

Islam has twice invaded Christian Europe. In 1683 the Ottoman Empire tried to «liberate» the city of Vienna. Or is it more correct to say that the city was liberated from an Islamic siege and occupation?

The third Islamic invasion of Europe is going on as we speak

The question of liberation or occupation is seldom about land. Its most likely a question about values. Its also a question about ideology and faith.

Few Europeans are aware that Islam was close to take over the Austrian capital of Vienna as late as the year of 1683. The Muslim army that attacked central Europa through the Balkans, was obviously portraying them self as «freedom fighters». They came to «liberate» Central Europe.

The Christians in Vienna did not want to be «liberated» by the Muslims. They looked on the Islamic forces as hostile. They represented a real threat of an unwanted Islamic occupation.

The Jews that lives in Judea and Samaria today feels the same way.

They do not want to be liberated by Islam. They feel that a two-state-solution will bring their freedom to and end, and the two Jewish districts will be given back to the previous Islamic occupiers.

Why do I use the term «Islamic occupation»?

Because before the liberation of Judea and Samaria in 1967, the two districts were under Islamic occupation. Even from 1917 to 1948 the land was free from Islamic oppression, controlled by the United Kingdom. The Britishers had «liberated» the land from an «occupation» by the Ottoman Empire that had lasted 400 years.

Today, the European Union wants to put the liberated Jewish settlers back under the same yoke of Islam, it self was fighting to be liberated from in 1683.

Since the city of Vienna needed to be protected from the threat of an Ottoman Islamic occupation, why should the same forces be allowed to reign over the Jewish homeland?

Is it the Jews or the Muslims who have liberated people in the Middle East, and particular inside the state of Israel?

The Ottoman control of Judea and Samaria has to be branded as an Islamic occupation, Likewise the Jordanian control over Judea and Samaria from 1948 to 1967.

People fight wars to either liberate others, or to get rid of their own occupation. After the six day war in 1967, Judea and Samaria was liberated. Still, most of the Biblical heartland of Israel is free from occupation. But the International community has already forced Israel to give some of the liberated Jewish land back to its previous occupiers.

First Published, September 11th, 2009.

Written by Ivar

July 5, 2013 0

South Africa involved in racism against Israel

Black racists claims Dead Sea products are made on “occupied Palestine territory”.

discover_main_img — The Dead Sea is Israeli, just like California is a part of the USA. Regardless of what liars and wicked people might say.

South Africa’s Department of Trade and Industry is preparing a policy change mandating that products originating from West Bank settlements not be labeled as Israeli products.

In a statement published last week in the governmental gazette, Trade Minister Rob Davies declared that consumers in South Africa should not be misled into believing that products originating from the “Occupied Palestinian Territories” originate from Israel.

The minister specified in his note some “misleading labeled products” as “Ahava products, and other cosmetic brands, technology and soft drinks.”
Israel reacted furiously to the South African announcement, which the Foreign Ministry said was the first of its kind in the world. Spokesman Paul Hirschson said the ministry would call in the South African ambassador to protest the move.

The singling out of one side of one conflict out of all the conflicts in the world is verging on racism,” he said, adding that “this is sad coming from South Africa, which should know better.”

Open Shuhada Street, a Palestinian international organization focusing on the issue of “rules of origin,” has been campaigning in South Africa for several months against products manufactured by Israelis in the West Bank. It has been threatening legal action whose goal would be to require the South African government to declare the labeling of these products as “illegal” and “consumer misleading.”

Source: Jerusalem Post

Every revolution eat its own children. Every change of power based on “humanism” will one day return to paganism and evil.

South African strongman Nelson Mandela had no agenda of liberty and democracy in South Africa. Today this nation of cripples by violence, black racism against all other minorities, and hate crimes.

Out of prison, Mandela was quick to entrance old allies in the African World. Like dictator and manslaughter Gaddafi in Libya. He also hailed dictator and communist Fidel Castor on Cuba, and Islamic terrorist Yasser Arafat.

Lets take a look at some pictures:

mandela1 — Nelson Mandela hailed the blood thirsty dictator in Tripoli.

Mandela4 — At the table of the wicked. Nelson Mandela, Yasser Arafat at Gadaffi planned a war against Zionism, by putting Islamic terrorists on the mountains of Zion.

mandela5 — People who promote totalitarian dictatorship always hail each other.

mandela6 — People who share the same ideology and agenda like to kiss each other.

mandela2 — And they often walk hand in hand, and set the course off the cliff.

That South Africa is involved in Racism against Jews is not a huge surprise. To say that the Dead Sea is not a part of Israel, is like saying that Los Angles in not a part of the USA. Its “occupied territory”, Hispanic by roots and nature, and should be the capital of an independent new Hispanic state inside California.

Proverbs 1:22
“How long will you simple ones love your simple ways? How long will mockers delight in mockery and fools hate knowledge?

Isaiah 29:20
The ruthless will vanish, the mockers will disappear, and all who have an eye for evil will be cut down—

Shame on all racists. Also the black racists in South Africa, God-mockers and Jew-haters all over the World.

Written by Ivar

May 21, 2012 5

UN Anti-racism conference infected by racism

There is no reason to honor an anti-racism conference that has become infected with racism.

Jews44 — Anne Bayefsky arranged a counter conferance to Durban II, that is sponsored by the UN

This is the view of Anne Bayefsky, a leading human rights scholar.

She organized a counter-conference on Thursday to challenge the misguided notion of the UN event Durban III.

The world’s leading democracies were not present during the UN-sponsored Durban III anti-racism ten-year commemoration event.

When this event opened in New York on Thursday, it sparked controversy at the UN General Assembly meeting and served as a setback for the Durban process.

Anne Bayefsky, a leading human rights scholar, who organized a counter-conference on Thursday to challenge the misguided notion of the UN event, sees no reason to honor an anti-racism conference that has become infected with racism.

Bayefsky cites the example from Durban I where a sizable number of conference participants openly championed the Hitler movement’s elimination of European Jewry and advocated a Nazi solution for Israel’s Jews.

Scores of banners in massive street demonstrations in Durban stated “Hitler should have finished the job,” and handouts with Hitler’s face read, “What if I had won? The good things: there would be no Israel.”

Source: Jerusalem Post

My comment:

The Islamic World will always target Israel in the United Nations. As long as there is a Jewish state in the Middle East, a prophet named Muhammed stand exposed as a false messenger.

One of the tactics of Islam, is to brand Zionism as racism. Nothing can be further from the truth. While the Islamic World is ethically cleansed for Jews, the state of Israel contains more than two million Arabs with Israeli citizenship. The majority of these Muslims are not called “Palestinians”, because they are not. They are Israeli Arabs.

The people who call them selves “Palestinians” are Jordanians who were expelled from Jordan in 1967. The Jordanian kingdom lost the six day war. Between 1948 and this lose there were no “Palestinian people”, only Jordanians living west of the Jordan river. They all refused to recognize the state of Israel, and sided with the Arab armies who attacked the reborn Jewish homeland.

Its time for the Jordanians to leave New York, and go home to Jordan. Accept that Muhammed is a false prophet, and embrace Jesus as the Messiah. Than all the curses up on your head will be lifer, and blessings will finally come to the Arab World.

John 14:6
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

Written by Ivar

September 23, 2011 4

Baseless Apartheid accusations against Israel

The former U.S. president Jimmy Carter was in December 2006 quoted by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz for saying: « Israeli policy in the West Bank represented instances of apartheid worse even that those that once held sway in South Africa».

This statement must have made Carter very popular in the Islamic World. But does his claims make sense? What are the possible similarities between the Apartheid regime in South Africa who ruled from 1948 to 1991, and modern day Israel? And what are the obvious differences?

Those who claims that Israel is an Apartheid regime, claims that the Arab Muslim minority is discriminated based on their color, creeds, religion and race, compared to the civil rights of the Jewish majority in Israel.

Nothing could be further from the truth. While the black majority in South Africa was banned from voting, banned from organizing them self in political parties, jailed for their political opinions, banned from owning land, and banned from educating them selves to certain skills reserved for the white minority, all this civil rights are available for two million Arab Israelis, the majority of them Muslims.

In Apartheid South Africa, it was even a criminal offense for a white person to have sex with a black person. There was also a Law which banned appeals against forced removal of a black worker, robbing the black majority for any kind of basic human rights.

To the rather opposite of what the Islamic World and ex-president Carter claims, its the Radical Islamic World who have created several Apartheid regimes in the Middle East. Banning Jews and Christians from the same civil rights, which they wrongly claim the nation of Israel have denied its Arab Muslim population. The best proof of the true face of Islam, can be seen in Bethlehem, the birth place of Jesus. After the Palestinian authority took over control of the city, the Christian population has been intimidated. Ultimately, the Christian population have declined from being a majority to become a minority of 20 per cent. During the Jewish control in Bethlehem, Christians enjoyed full protection and prosperity.

In Gaza, Hamas displayed its true colors when they executed their rivals in Al Fatah, by throwing them off the roofs of tall buildings. No justice, no mercy, only rootless evil. No rule of law, not even Apartheid-laws.

Written by Ivar

April 21, 2011 13