Pope entrust Benin to “Our lady of Africa”

Pope Benedict claim to know “Christ”. But at the end of many messages, he honor “his mother” the “Queen of Heaven”.

The black Queen of Heaven, and her black son. The Pope wants all Africans to honor “Our Lady of Africa”.

This is what the Catholic News Agency recorded at the very end of a news report from Benin:

The Pope concluded by entrusting the dioceses of Benin and the episcopal ministry of each bishop to the Virgin Mary, Our Lady of Africa, praying that “she may watch over the people of Benin!”

Source: CNA.

My comment:

It is important to acknowledge that many who claim they know “Christ”, do not know the Messiah at all. The Pope is the ultimate deceiver of the flock. If he had just been the strange neighbor next door, he would have been a rather harmless confused old man.

The challenge for the World, is that the Pope claims to the be the “Vicar of Christ”. His very replacement on Earth, who is promoted to be the leader of all the Bishops on Planet Earth. The very head of the “Christian religion”.

A deeper look at who “Our Lady of Africa” is, will expose some rather bizarre images. She is found inside a “Church” called Notre-Dame d’Afrique, a Catholic center of worship in Alger in Algeria, overlooking the Bay of Algiers.

She reigns in the center of the room, and over her head it is written: “Notre-dame d’Afrique, Pray for us and for the Muslims”.

Over the crown of the Queen, this is written in French.

Below her, on the floor, there is a large crucifix. But this religious symbol is an abomination. On the cross, hangs a thin and anemic black African. I wonder who this man was, and what he is doing here. He hangs under the footstool of the “Queen of Heaven”, who is also a black African.

One Marian site has the following explanation:

 In many places where Muslims and Christians live together they share a devotion to Mary. And so, on any given day one may see Muslims kneeling in the basilica, bringing their petitions to Our Lady, whom they call Lala Meriem.

Source: The Interfaith Mary

Muslims comes to this religious monument, to honor the Islamic Queen of Heaven.

“Lala Meriem” is not very different from the Jewish name of a Jewess, a virgin who gave birth to the Messiah. Her name was Miriam.  The Muslims claims they have replaced the Jews as the “holy people of god”.  The Africans by origin comes to this place, and worship the Queen of Heaven: as “uMama waAfrika”.

The black Queen of Heaven, the mother of the Pope , “our lady of Africa”.
The Universal Queen of paganizem is put on the throne to reign.
On the ceiling there is a huge painting of the ruling Queen inside Heaven, together with all who worship her and her son.

The present Pope just walks in the footsteps of the late Pontiff. This is a record from 1989, when John Paul II travelled to Malawi.

 The first Catholic missionaries claimed Malawi for the Mother of God. Those who resumed their work placed a medal honouring her at the foot of a baobab tree, in order to consecrate this land to her. Following their example, I, John Paul II, also wish to entrust the Church and the whole country of Malawi to Mary, Our Lady of Africa:

 Source:The Vatican.va.

Muslims do not mind seeing a dead black person hanging on the cross, below their “Lala Meriem”. A cursed figure.
If you ever visit Alger, this is the “Church” of the One World Religion.
Roman Catholics and Muslims praying together to the Queen of Heaven, blessed by the Pope in Rome.

The One World religion is coming towards us with force and convictions. A few days ago, I exposed that the Pope prayed for the people of Algeria to be blessed, as he flew over Algeria. Obviously, He was spiritually connected to his mother, who reigns in the “Church” he flew over.  Islam and the pagan Catholic faith will one day merge. The spirit that reigns in them, will make them agree to worship and unite around “Lala Meriem” as “our Lady of Africa, the virgin who gave birth to “Christ”.

First published 2011.

Written by Ivar

Pope: – No Church without Mother of God inside

“One cannot therefore speak of the Church unless Mary, Mother of God is present.”

The Pope can only see a "Church", if the pagan Queen of Heaven is present.

These are the words of the Pope, at the  his March 14 general audience at the Vatican.

Pope Benedict stressed the importance of Mary’s presence in the Church, then and now, with a quotation from the third- and-fourth century bishop Saint Chromatius of Aquileia – who declared in a sermon that “one cannot therefore speak of the Church unless Mary, Mother of God is present.”

The Pope makes pilgrimage to the caves and tabernacles where the unclean spirit of the Queen of Heaven appears.

Jesus’ mother “ was placed by the Lord at the decisive moments of salvation history and has always been able to respond with full availability, the result of a deep relationship with God developed in assiduous and intense prayer,”.

This is what the Pope told the more than 10,000 pilgrims in St. Peter’s Square.

This Wednesday, he began a new chapter in his series of talks on prayer by focusing on the role of prayer in the early Church, with Mary as its first and greatest disciple.

While Jesus’ disciples often showed their human weaknesses and lack of understanding, Mary modeled a deeper life of contemplation and wisdom, made possible by the Holy Spirit within her.

In this way, the Pope said, she paved the way for the disciples’ reception of the same Spirit at Pentecost.

“If there is no Church without Pentecost, there is no Pentecost without the mother of Jesus,” he said,  “because she lived in a unique way, which the Church experiences each day under the action of the Holy Spirit.”

Source: CNA

My comment:

Miriam, the Jewish mother of Jesus the Messiah must have been a wonderful young woman. But like all created beings, she was a sinner that needed to be saved by her Son.

When the Pope speaks about “The Mother of God” he do not speak about Miriam, or whatever name you want to give her in the English language.

“The Mother of God” is the Pagan Queen of Heaven, a goddess who lived in Babylon. From the fall of Babel to this day, pagans have been worshiping her as divine.

The Roman Catholic Church tried to mix this pagan goddess into Christianity, by claiming “Catholic Mary” being the “Mother of God”, and the Queen of Heaven.

Like normal when the Pontiff demands all churches to return to Roman Catholic Marianism, he utters a long list of blasphemies.

Let us take a look at the most obvious blasphemy of the Pope:

Lie number 1:

 “Mary” has always been able to respond with full availability, the result of a deep relationship with God developed in assiduous and intense prayer,”

The truth:

Mary can not respond with “full availability”. That is the role of the Messiah. He is omnipresent, and can listen to our prayer. Miriam can not. She is a created being. I am convinced she was saved, and are home in Heaven. She can not listen to all prayers, and she will definitely not entertain anyone who claim she is the pagan goddess of the Roman Catholic Church.

Lie number 2:

 …with Mary as its first and greatest disciple.

The Truth:

The Bible do not have a “greatest disciple”. All created beings are equals in the body of the Messiah. There is not a single line in the Bible that gives the Jewish mother of Jesus an elevated post within the group of disciples. Miriam was blessed among women. Not blessed above woman.

Lie number 3:

 Mary modeled a deeper life of contemplation and wisdom.

 The truth:

This is pure fiction, without any base in the Bible what so ever.  The Jewish virgin Miriam has no teaching of her own. She is not mentioned after the second chapter in the book of Acts. No letter from her “deeper life” is recorded in the Bible, nor does any of the gospel writes quote a single line from her “wisdom”.

Lie number 4:

 she paved the way for the disciples’ reception of the same Spirit at Pentecost.

 The truth:

The Jewish virgin that birthed Jesus has no role to play in the “reception of the Holy Spirit” on the day of Pentecost. This is solely a move by the tribune God: Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Lie number 5:

 “there is no Pentecost without the mother of Jesus,”

 The truth:

The Pope elevates “Catholic Mary” to the level of God. He could easily have written: “There is no God without the mother of Jesus”. What a blunt paganized and perverted version of the truth. What a damnable heretic fairy tale copy of the Scriptures.

Out of the mouth of the Pope comes blasphemy and lawless talk.  God have given you multiple examples for you to renounce this evil. One the day of Judgment you will have no excuse for your support for this “church”  with an antichrist as your head.

Written by Ivar

Catholic Mary appeared at pagan temple site in Mexico

“Build a shrine for me here”. This was the order from the ghost that appeared to Juan Diego in 1531 A,D. He was canonized in 2002.

A ghost appeared to a Mexican on a pagan temple site. She wanted him to build a shrine to her.

It is not unusual that demons and evil spirits manifests them selves at pagan temple sites. That is why we must be careful to take the messages of the disciples of the “Queen of Heaven” at face value.

Fist of all. The Jewish girl Miriam has no authority to appear to us.

There is nothing in the Bible that points to such appearances. She is not mentioned in the Prophetic Word, neither in the book of Daniel, nor in the Apocalypse of John. In the last book of the Bible, it is explained to us two very different women. One is the nation of Israel, the other a whore.  No image can ever fit better than “Catholic Mary” into the demonic creation of the great prostitute.

Not a single words of Jesus gives us the reason to elevate this Torah obeying Jewish girl, who were blessed among woman. Not blessed above them. A demon can easily appear to copy her. Because Satan and his flock are lawless beings. Demonic forces would love to take human beings for a ride.

Paul explains to us that there will be false apostles among us, massacring as apostles of “Christ”. No doubt that Satan can appear as an angle of light. I guess also disguise him self to be both “Jesus” and who the Catholic claim is his “mother”.

The message from the ghost to Juan Diego gives us reasons to believe the Mexican have been deceived:

Lets take a look at the message he received:

 “I am your compassionate Mother, yours and that of all the people that live together in this land,” she continued, “and also of all the other various lineages of men.”

The Jewish virgin never claim to be the mother of “all lineages of men”. This is not a message from the Bible, but from the demonic realm.

Further we can read, in the message from the Catholic news agency CNA

  She asked Juan Diego to make a request of the local bishop. “I want very much that they build my sacred little house here”—a house dedicated to her son Jesus Christ, on the site of a former pagan temple, that would “show him” to all Mexicans and “exalt him” throughout the world.

Source: CNA

The Pagan Mexicans had no problem to accept this message. because the Pagans believe that their “gods” comes and lives in their temples.

So why not also the “Christian” god, and her mother?

God of Israel who was living behind the curtain in the Temples in Jerusalem. The problem is that the New Testament explains that God do no longer live in buildings made by man. The demon in Mexico obviously would make a mockery out of the scripture.

Since the pagan goddess already had the dominion over the pagan temple site, the demon obviously wanted the Mexican to build a shrine on the site. Satan wanted this deceived Mexican to mislead others to believe that paganism can be mixed with Biblical Christianity.

Reading the account of Wikipedia will put come could water into the cup of the most committed Catholics. The story of this saint, is yet another example of falsification of history.

 The historic veracity of both sources are considered questionable by many historians. The primary doubts arise in the dearth of sources about the apparition and consequently about Juan Diego in the 117 years between the time given for the apparition and the first publication of the story.

  Furthermore the fact that Bishop Zúmarraga who figures as a prominent character in the account has not left any mention of either Juan Diego or the apparition in his otherwise ample correspondence is a problem for the credibility of the accounts.

According to the traditional account, the original image of Our lady of Guadalupe miraculously appeared on the cloak of Juan Diego, on the hill of Tepeyac near Mexico City on December 12, 1531. The two primary sources to the life of Juan Diego are from 1648 and 1649.

Juan Diego was canonized by Pope John Paul II on July 31, 2002.

(end of Wikipedia).

My comment:

To create a story after 117 years of silence, is difficult. Falsehood can easily be used to spice up the message.

The Roman Catholic Church can not even agree on who this man Juan Diego was. Images of Him portray him, both as a native Indian and a Spanish noble man. Here are some of them:

Juan Diego as a colonialist from Spain.
Juan Diego as a native Mexian Indian.
Maybe both the "saint" and the lady of Guadalupe were white Europeans?

There are hundreds of images that display different men, claiming to be the same man.  In the court of Law, such testimonies are dismissed. They are not valid.

Let us take a look at some few more pictures that illustrate this point.

A native Indian bows down before the ghost.
The image of a Pope bowing before an image of the ghost, held by a native Mexican "saint".
Archbishop Raymond L. Burke at the shrine in in La Crosse, US Wisconsin., where Juan Diego is understood to be a Spanish nobleman living in Mexico.
Archbishop Burke blesses the statue of the Spanish noble man, bowing before "our lady of Guadalupe

Who do these priests and Bishops think they are?

The Pope has canonized a “saint” that has at least a dual personality.

Fools like to be fooled by other fools.

Written by Ivar

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑