Parading the “holy” skull on Czech statehood day

28th of September is Czech Statehood Day, and the Roman Catholics are taking their “saint”out for a stroll.

No one asked the "saint" if it desired to be carried like this.
No one asked the “saint” if it desired to be carried like this.

Wenceslaus I  (907-935 A.D) was the duke of Bohemia from 921 until his assassination in 935, purportedly in a plot by his own brother, Boleslav the Cruel.

Since 2000, the feast day of Saint Wenceslas (September 28) is a public holiday in the Czech Republic, celebrated as Czech Statehood Day.

This is a photo of the procession of the skull of St. Wenceslaus in Wenceslas Square in Stara Boleslav, Czech Republic before solemn Mass.

Source: Badgercatholic.bloggspot.no

My comment:

It is not easy to say if it is the skull that is taking these men out for a stroll, or the opposite.

How disgraceful and morbid. To take a deceased corpse up from the grave, to behead the skeleton, and dress up the skull.

That Roman Catholics call this kind of activities “holy” is bad enough.  Every soul that has to spend eternity in Hell is a great tragedy.

The bishop and a cut off skull.
The bishop and a cut off skull.

My concern is that this kind of grotesque and morbid religiosity in the name of “Jesus”, keeps millions of people holding a finger over their nose.

They tell their children not to have anything to do with “Jesus”, not knowing that Roman Catholicism has absolutely nothing to do with true Christianity.

The Vatican bishops promote a copy-cat religion. They present a “Christ” that accept a doctrinal mix of Biblical stuff and paganism.

My prayer is that people must not take a stand against Jesus the Messiah, because some of his claimed followers are serving Satan in the name of “Jesus”.

Please open your Bible and see the wonderful story about Jesus of Nazareth, the servant of God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

May God of Israel save you. Amen.

Written by Ivar

Pope wants all Christians to accept His claimed succession from Apostle Peter

Roman Catholic Church’s wish for an «ecclesiology of communion» in recognizing the establishment of the Petrine lineage of the Church of Rome.

The Pope in Rome wants all Christians to rally behind his claimed apostleship.

Pope Benedict XVI reached out to Bartholomew I and the Eastern Church Monday in his annual letter to the Patriarch celebrating the Feast of St. Andrew. The message encouraged continued ecumenical talks towards unification of the churches of the East and West and «openness to the Holy Spirit» to guide them in the process.

The letter was delivered to the Ecumenical Patriarch of Istanbul, Bartholomew I, by way of a Papal delegation led by the President of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity Cardinal Walter Kasper. The delegation concelebrated Mass with the Patriarch and gave him the letter in a ceremony afterwards.

«Our Churches have committed themselves sincerely over the last decades to pursuing the path towards the re-establishment of full communion, and although we have not yet reached our goal, many steps have been taken that have enabled us to deepen the bonds between us».

Pope Benedict XVI chose to reiterate the words that he had used while in Phanar, Turkey in 2006, to express his the Roman Catholic Church’s wish for an «ecclesiology of communion» in recognizing the establishment of the Petrine lineage of the Church of Rome. He wrote, «

It is a question of seeking together, inspired by the model of the first millennium, the forms in which the ministry of the Bishop of Rome may accomplish a service of love recognized by one and all».

Source: Catholic News Agency (CNA):

My comment:

The Papal Church stands on two pillars:

The Jewish Apostle Peter would have fallen sick and fainted if he had seen the idol claimed to be of him in the Vatican. Who made him black in the first place?

One:

That the Popes has a Biblical authority, because they are the successors of the Apostle Peter.

Two:

That Jesus is physically present in the blood and wine at the alter of Catholic Churches, to be crucified every day in a not bloody manner.

If these two pillars are false, than the Church of Rome is a complete falsehood.

The Bible says Paul went to Rome. Not Peter. When Paul wrote the Apostolic letter to the believers in Rome, Peter was not even mentioned. Strange if Peter was supposed to become the first Bishop of Rome.

Peter was apostle to the Jews, not the gentiles in the pagan Roman empire. He wrote on of his letter from the Kingdom of Parthia, in todays Iraq. This kingdom was full of Jews who did not go back to Jerusalem after the exile in Babylon. Since Paul went westwards to Rome, Peter was sent to the Jews in the East.

Peter wrote two letters. No of them is mentioning Rome with a single word.

Peter was a married man. If He was the first Bishop of Rome, the pope is a blunt sinner by denying all Catholic priests, Bishop and Cardinals their Biblical right to marry.

The Pope in Rome claims Biblical authority from a mortal man, still denying that the Bible is the true Word of God. The Roman Catholic Church breeds sin, by letting Papal doctrines, human made rules and tradition nullify the Word of God, found in the Holy Bible.

Martin Luther was right. The Papal system is a corrupt Church, and is ruled by the spirit of antichrist. There is no truth in this claim from the Pope.

Written by Ivar

First published: 3rd December 2009.

Argentinian Pope offended the Queen of England

Pope Francis is wrong on Falklands, says David Cameron.

The new Pope has a political record that has already got him into trouble.
The new Pope has a political record that has already got him into trouble.

New pope was wrong to say last year that Britain had ‘usurped’ islands from Argentina, says prime minister. Less than 48 hours into the world’s first Latin American papacy.

David Cameron took issue in public with Pope Francis on Friday, quipping that the “white smoke over the Falklands was pretty clear” and dismissing the pontiff’s explicit claims backing Argentinian ownership of the South Atlantic islands.

The Catholic Church now has two Popes. One who flattered the Queen of England, and one who offends her.
The Catholic Church now has two Popes. One who flattered the Queen of England, and one who offends her.

As archbishop of Buenos Aires, the new pope had frequently laid claim to Argentinian dominion over the Falklands, describing them as part of Argentina’s homeland. He had presided over religious ceremonies commemorating his countrymen’s servicemen who died in the 1982 war following the junta’s invasion of the islands.

“I don’t agree with him, respectfully, obviously,” Cameron said when asked about Pope Francis’s views on the Falklands.

Source: The Guardian

My comment:

If the Roman Catholic Church had been the servant of God of the Bible, this organization would not be occupied by worldly politics.

The Papacy has been the ruler over Kings and Queens, since its establishment around 350 A.D. When you get involved in “Caesar’s business”, you will obviously make enemies.

Jesus the Messiah was above politics, and concerned about the Kingdom of Heaven. The Papacy is the seat of a fleshy, created being, a fake authority claiming to be the “Vicar of Christ”.

 John 18:36

 Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here.”

In regards to the new Argentinian Pope, he obviously had to take the side of the Fascist military dictators. Also in regards to the Argentinian demands for control of the Falkland Islands.

That seems to be safe play….as long as you did not need the support of Catholics in the United Kingdom….

Now where are their loyalty?

With the Papacy, or with their Queen?

It is always difficult to get it both ways….

Written by Ivar

Pope tells pilgrims “god” told him to resign

The Pope told pilgrims that he was resigning because God had called on him to devote himself to prayer.

The Pope claims "god" wanted him to leave the office of the "Holy see".
The Pope claims “god” wanted him to leave the office of the “Holy see”.

Pope Benedict XVI has given his pontificate’s final Sunday blessing from his studio window to the cheers of tens of thousands of people in St. Peter’s Square.

Benedict says even though he’s retiring on Thursday from the papacy, the first pope in 600 years to do so, he’s “not abandoning the church.”

In a voice breaking with emotion that he was resigning because God had called on him to devote himself to prayer but said he would not foresake a Church role.

Source: The Telegraph.co.uk

My comment:

The “god”of the vatican moves in mysterious ways.  The late Pope was crippled by Parkinson decease. Still this “god” did not tell Johan Paul II to resign, and “devote him self to prayer”.

The present Pope claim that the same “god” told him to resign, despite the Pontiff being able to serve.

Godbye.....!!!!
Goodbye…..!!!!

It could be that this “god” is not God of the Bible.

And if it is not God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob who run the business in Rome, than the Pontiff takes orders directly from Satan.

In public life, there is no one who is forced to serve. Not even a King.

But for the last 600 years the claimed infallible Popes have served beyond their capabilities to even say a word.

There seems to be other reasons than “god” forcing the present Pope to resign.

Satan seems to be in need of fresh blood to serve Him. The last and final antichrist is about to enter the world stage.  With the blessings of the Roman Catholic Church.

Written by Ivar

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑