– Israel can bomb Iran and can do it alone

There is only one way to avoid a nuclear Iran: to attack it. Don’t say it can’t be done.

Amos Regev is editor-in-chief of Israel Hayom.
Amos Regev is editor-in-chief of Israel Hayom, the largest Israeli daily Newspaper.

Editorial by Amos Regev is editor-in-chief of Israel Hayom.

Any deal, bad or somewhat bad, won’t change that  The IDF has already proved it can do the impossible; it can also do the unthinkable • Ultimately, we cannot trust anyone but ourselves.

A deal with Iran, be it bad or just somewhat bad, cannot change the fact that the only way to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon is to attack it — as a last resort.

An attack is doable.

The United States and the West do not want to attack. 

”This nation is sick and tired of war,” U.S. President Barack Obama said on Sept. 10, when he addressed the nation on the situation in Syria. He was quoting a veteran of the U.S. armed forces. He hoped that by harping on this sentiment he could explain his sudden decision to seek congressional approval for a limited attack on Syria.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin E. Dempsey and other senior officers have leaked to the press that an attack on Iran would be dangerous and problematic and would not get the job done. At most, they warn, it would delay Iran’s nuclear program by a few years. This, they warned, was not worth the cost.

Israel has an entire gang of Dempseys of its own, including former Mossad chief Meir Dagan, former IDF Chief of General Staff Gabi Ashkenazi and their chorus of supporters in the press and in the halls of the Knesset. It cannot be done, they say. Israel cannot handle a mission of such magnitude all by itself, they warn. And besides, this is the world’s problem, have trust in the Americans, they plead.

Well, it appears that the U.S. cannot be trusted, and that there is no such thing as “it cannot be done.”

The 1982 Argentinian invasion of the Falkland Islands — which wrested control of the disputed territory from the U.K. in a mere few hours — had British officials deliberate among themselves what could be done to liberate the islands. After holding several sessions to discuss the unfolding situation, the U.S. Navy concluded that a British campaign 8,000 miles (13,000 kilometers) from home “would not be militarily feasible.”

Even the U.K.’s defense secretary, the high command and the Royal Air Force were convinced that there was no viable military option.

But then-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was determined; she dispatched the Royal Navy to the southern hemisphere and it did the “impossible.”

No two historical contexts are exactly the same. But human beings have acted and behaved in very similar ways throughout history.

On June 5, 1967, the Israel Air Force launched Operation Moked, essentially neutralizing the threat posed by Arab air forces. It didn’t destroy everything and the Arabs still had some airplanes, but the mission’s goals — achieving air supremacy and removing the threat on Israel’s population centers — were accomplished.

Source: Israel Hayom.

My comment:

There is not much to add to this editorial.

During Second World War, the Jewish people understood that no one would defend a Jew, against Jew-haters and not lift a finger to stop the mass murders of children and woman.

The Holocaust was a proof, that the Jewish people in the future had to reply on their own security measures, to avoid the massacres to be repeated.

Because in World history we learn, that evil and sinful men repeat their gross crimes against humanity. Sometimes it only takes a generation or two, before the dogs return to their own vomit.

Stand up for Israel. Bless the Jewish people. Stop Iran for developing nuclear arms, surrey to be used by the Global jihadists.

Written by Ivar

Priests offers mass in front of rusted chains in Rome

A Roman Catholic priest hold up “Jesus of Rome” in front of some rusted chains, claimed to have hold Peter the Apostle.

Roman Catholic priests worship with some “holy” rusted chains above the altar.

If you do not find holding corpses inside altars of Churches quite bizarre, you might like this kind of story.

Inside  the Church of Saint Peter in Chains (San Pietro in Vincoli al Colle Oppio) in Rome, a Roman Catholic priest conduct a mass in front of some ancient rusted chains.

The priest lifts up “Wafer Jesus” in front of the chains.
The “holy” chains that the Vatican claims were used during the arrest of Peter.

The Vatican claims that these chains were used to hold “St.Peter” when he was arrested, and faced martyrdom in Rome.

There is obviously some problems with this kind of claims.

1. There is no biblical evidence that Peter was in Rome.

2.  Anyhow: How do your prove that some rusted chains had anything to do with anyone, living 2.000 years ago?

3. And if the authenticity of the chains can be proven, what makes a piece of metal “holy”?

4, Even if you felt there was some kind of collectors value of these chains, why put them in a golden glass box, and hang them on the wall insider a Church.

5. And if you want to keep this kind of stuff inside a Church, why hang it over an altar?

My take on this:

A Papist found some chains, and used them as yet another item that could elevate him self, and keep the flock in bondage to worship of created things.

The Church started to demand that the faithful should believe these chains are “holy” and that they were used to arrest Peter.
Inside the Church of St. Peter’s chains, you will also see that the Catholics adore and venerate the chains.

Even holding up the Eucharist with the “physical Jesus” in front of the chains.

What is so adorable about chains?

It is rather tasteless, that Roman Catholic even wants to look at such chains.

If they are not just fake and falsehood:

They were most likely used by satanic anti-Christian butchers, who martyred Jews and Evangelical Christians in Rome. All who refused to bow down to the Emperor of Rome and his Pope were placed in chains, and executed.

What a shameful, distasteful site of wickedness.

Are you a Roman Catholic?

I hope and pray the Holy Spirit will cut deep into your heart.

Do you want to avoid the fire of Hell?

Renounce the priesthood that have deceived you, or face stern judgment.

You brood of vipers. Repent or perish.

Written by Ivar

Daily bread from the life of Y´shua

Mark 3:4
Then Jesus asked them, “Which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to kill?” But they remained silent.

The Messiah asked a good question. His answer was His own actions. There was an uproar when Jesus healed a man on a Sabbath day.  The Messiah even told that rescue workers could do good on the official day of rest.  I guess that climbing down in a well to collect a sheep, was not an easy task 2000 years ago. I am also pretty sure that man must have been tired, and might have stayed at home the very next day. Making both the Sabbath and the following day Holy.

MK to Kerry: You are not an honest peace broker

Continuing trend of MKs from her party penning letters to US secretary of state, Orit Struck says Kerry echoes Palestinian stance.

MK Knesset understands that John Kerry do not work for God of the Bible.
MK Orit Struck understands that John Kerry do not work for God of the Bible.

US Secretary of State John Kerry is not a fair negotiator, MK Orit Struck (Bayit Yehudi) wrote Friday, in what appears to be a trend of lawmakers from her party penning angry letters to Kerry.

Struck’s letter came after Channel 2 News interviewed Kerry Thursday, and the lawmaker summarized his comments as “threatening Israel with a third Intifada if it refuses to capitulate to [his] demands and those of the Palestinians and remove its soldiers from the areas of Judea and Samaria.”

What Kerry told Channel 2’s Udi Segal is: “The alternative to getting back to the talks is the potential of chaos. Does Israel want a third intifada?”

The Bayit Yehudi MK thanked Kerry in her letter, saying his words “finally and most strikingly revealed the extent to which you cannot serve as an honest broker.”

Source: Jerusalem Post

My comment:

Over the past weeks I have written several articles about the mischief of Roman Catholic “peace broker” John Kerry. Just like former British PM, Tony Blair, Kerry work for the papacy.

To be able to lift the Pope back to power in Jerusalem, Zionism must be brought to and end. The best way to do this, is to frighten and scare the Jewish people.  The PLO is the perfect tool for the Americas, do do the ditty work for Rome.

The Pope basically do not work for a division of Jerusalem. He works for a new special regime, that shall be established in the Old City. A special administrator who honor all religions, shall be elevated and take control of the stage.  In the Bible, this man is known.  It is the last man of compromises and lawlessness, the last and final antichrist, a false “prince of peace”.

To make the Jews opt for the “special regime”,  rather than a division of Jerusalem, the forces who promote division must be supported and strengthen. That is who the Papacy and his knight John Kerry, also support Islam.  When Islam gets strong, the Jews will eventually come to the camel, and sign the final papers.

Such is the nature of evil. Such is the Satanic plan for Jerusalem.

Behold:  The rule of the last and final antichrist and his Hell bound followers, will be brief.

It will be abruptly destroyed by the incoming Messiah, Jesus of Nazareth, when He returns as the Lion of Judah. The last man of lawlessness will be terminated by the splendor of the return of the King of Kings, and the Lords of Lords. Amen.

Written by Ivar

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑