Christian TV-anchor in Norway had to remove cancer and kidney

– The cancer was a result of my earlier life in sin.

Jan Hanvold use and defend false Word of Faith preacher Thurman Scrivner.

This is the explanation by Jan Hanvold, the TV-anchor of Vision Norge. As editor of this Christian TV channel  Hanvold has let American Faith healer Thurman Scrivner preach.

Scrivner preach that children are born handicapped because of the sin of the parent’s, and that its possible to live a life without getting sick.

Hanvold is not ready to rebuke Scrivner. Because they have both been educated and anointed in Tulsa Oklahoma, at Oral Roberts “Word of faith” University.

Hanvold tries to defend Scrivner.
“Sin is to miss the target.  When a smoker, get lung cancer, it is a result of sin. It is even written on the cigarette package that is dangerous to smoke. When a drug addict get a disabled child, its because of this sin”, explains Hanvold.

About his own cancer, Hanvold has the following explanation.
“I had to remove the kidney because of cancer three years ago. The cancer was a result of my life in sin. My diet was wrong”, confess Hanvold.

Source: Norwegian secular Daily “Dagbladet”

My comment:

I know that Hanvold do not agree with all men like Thurman Scrivner preach. Like Scrivner’s demonic doctrine that people do not need any other doctor than Jesus. Such preachers says between the lines that their “Jesus” never uses doctors, but only Faith Healers.

But why at all let men like Scrivner come on the air?

To say that sickness is a result of sin, is of course not false. If you do not take care of your health, you will most likely fall sick very soon.

But to say that all sickness is a result of sin, is false teaching. Because all men have to live in a polluted World, and might fall sick regardless of how strong faith they have in Jesus.

– Do Jesus heal the flesh of all people who comes to him in faith?

Yes He surely can, but He does the healing in His time and His ways. And He heals regardless of the amount of anointing oil, confession and prayer we might offer Him. Jesus did not remove the cancer in Hanvold’s kidney. He is a good example that the teaching of Scrivner is false. Praise Jesus who used a doctor to heal Hanvold, by removing a diseased kidney.

Why did God not remove Hanvold’s cancer?

According to the gospel of Scrivner, Hanvold must have failed to confessed all the sins in his life. If this is not the case, than “Scrivner’s god” is a failure. And his religion is false.

Hanvold did the right thing. He was not sure it was the will of Jesus to skip the hospital. Trusting men like Scrivner, Hanvold might not have been with us on Earth today.

By the preaching of Scrivner, we are back into a wicked false Gospel of works. False Word of Faith teachers preach that if we do confess enough, pray enough, or use enough anointing oil, God’s healing of our flesh is supposed to be an automatic surety.

Such a false “healing of the flesh gospel”, is a contradiction of the true salvation gospel of Jesus of The Bible. He came to save our souls, with everlasting life in Heaven as the only valid perspective.

As Paul explains:

Romans 4:8.

If we live, we live to the Lord; and if we die, we die to the Lord. So, whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord.

Philippians 1:21

For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain.

Faith Healers do not believe in this message. For them its obvious that Christians who die of sickness in earlier days must have misunderstood the gospel of fame, prosperity and perfect health.

And God can only be moved by men with perfect faith, who pray correctly, the prayers that men like Scrivner prays. Only they seems to be able to summon God to heal on command.  And if there is a failure, there is nothing wrong with the preacher or the message. The default always lies with the receiver, who will live in bondage, and might die doubting the power of the cross.

Do Jesus want his children to be sick?

Is He incapable of healing us from all kind of sicknesses?

Absolutely not.

But sometimes Jesus knows better than Scrivner and Hanvold what is better for sick TV-viewers. Sometimes He calls people home from this sick and corrupt World, to a far better place to be.

For in Jesus we have received the purpose of out faith, the salvation of our souls. Our citizenship is in Heaven.

God-TV turns into Serpent-TV mocks God of the Bible

«Man is not created, men are creators». This is a message from Muslim turned preacher on God-TV, Dr. Nasir K. Siddiki.

A Muslim turned teacher of witchcraft and prosperity in the name of Jesus
Nasir K. Siddiki is a Muslim turned teacher of witchcraft and prosperity in the name of Jesus

The serpent in the garden of Eden told Eve that she would become like a god, just listen to him, and get fresh prosperity by eating the apple. Thats exactly the same message this Sunday on the claimed to be a Christian TV-Channel, «God TV». The TV-channel is in need of cash, and have an «Action Week».

The logic of this Muslim turned a prosperity teachers, is that God wanted man to be fruitful. The word fruitful is meant to be «creative», in regards to Siddikis understanding of the scriptures.

«We are not created. We are creators. Because we are made in God´s image», explains Siddikis.

«And when we speak scriptures, we speak like God, we creates». Thats the logic.

Siddikis goes on saying that: Jesus was the King of Kings. So you have to act like a King, just speak like the King of Kings and create. Because you are a King.

The fascinating thing about such teaching is, that it is pure witchcraft pretended to be Christianity. That I can create what I speak basically makes me a «God the Creator». That is also very similar to the teaching of Hinduism, that teach that god is everything.

Let us try to do what Siddiki tells us to do:

«I am a lion». Witches will basically tell you, that you can be transformed into a lion. In the Spiritual realm. You can even do more than that: Just say: «I am a demon».

If man can speak things into existence, man can also claim ownership to it, I could only say: «Thank you Jesus. I claim Bank of America to be mine. Amen».

The conclusion of the teaching of Dr. Nasir K. Siddiki is that we are all fools who do not do that, since we have this kind of powers. But since Siddiki him self has not jet become the owner of Bank of America, He will first try his magic formula to get all your money. He calls it the «right seed».

You basically have to send your money into the bank account of God-TV, and than you shall see the prosperity Heaven opens, and re-fill your bank account. Even with 100 times the amount you have sent into the account of God-TV. So if you just send them a million US dollar, you will get 100 million US dollar in return. Thats amazing. If we all do this, someone need to go into Space and fetch money, since the Reserve bank of America will soon go empty.

And by the way: If both I and Siddiki claims ownership to the same bank, who will God of the Bible give it to?

What Dr. Nasir K. Siddiki is telling on God-TV is fraud. Its a day light robbery of your money. He is a false teacher, who uses the name of Jesus to turn you into a witch and a person who indulge in Spiritual prostitution.

Keep your God-TV off, and give some money to help your next door neighbor through his financial crisis instead.

Have a blessed Sunday. And may God of the Bible bless you with all kind of Heavenly blessings and cut you off from all kinds of fleshy desires. May you have all the money that you need. In the name of God of Israel and Jesus the Messiah. Amen.

2 Corinthians 6:10

sorrowful, yet always rejoicing; poor, yet making many rich; having nothing, and yet possessing everything.

First published: 20.09.09.

Benny Hinn rebuked by the Vatican he claims he supports

The Vatican do not want to be supported by Word of Faith teacher Benny Hinn.

Benny Hinn on a miracle crusaide in India

The Roman Catholic Church is not supported by many Evangelical Pastors. Benny Hinn is en exception. And as a bizarre contradiction of the truth: While Benny Hinn claims he support the Vatican, the Papal system claims they have no records of him doing so.

Not so strange. Benny Hinn banked on nobody would cross check his claimed support of the Vatican Patrons of the Arts and the Vatican Museums.

Take look at this latest exposure of the falsehood around Benny Hinn:

Verbal statement from Benny Hinn

Benny Hinn’s original written statement, dated July 24, was followed up with verbal statements during a July 30 crusade in Oakland, California. The telecast was aired August 5 on Hinn’s This Is Your Day! program, and aired again on August 13

( http://www.bennyhinn.org/media/2010-8-13.asx ).

During the crusade, Hinn revealed additional details about his invitation to the Vatican, his becoming a Patron of the Arts, and traveling arrangements with Paula White:

The Vatican did invite me a few days ago. They made me a Patron of the Arts in the Vatican two weeks ago. And that’s a fact! A Patron of the Arts means you support the Vatican so they can maintain all the work of Michelangelo. I’m one of the guys now that supports what they do. And that is a fact. I was there, and we were taken around by a man named Wilhelm Kramer [or Cramer]. And they asked me, literally they said, “Do you know people that can help us financially?” I said, “Alright.”

Now here’s where I made my mistake: I let her [Paula White] come with me to Rome, so she can donate money. That was stupid on my part. And for that I do ask forgiveness. But that was an innocent mistake, nothing to do with stupid stuff.

[To our Partners… A Special Message from Pastor Benny Hinn, Miracle Crusade, Oakland, California, July 30, 2010, http://www.bennyhinn.org/media/2010-8-13.asx %5D.

A US Magazine exposes Benny Hinn and Paula White in Rome.

To recap, during the crusade, Benny Hinn told his partners he was invited to the Vatican in Rome, Italy, that he agreed to financially support the Patron of the Arts program,and that he was made a Patron of the Arts.

Hinn also said that he let Paula White come with him to Rome, “so she can donate money.”

However, there is another side to Hinn’s and White’s statements.

Statement from a Vatican official

Mark Haydu is a Catholic priest and the International Coordinator/Director of The Patrons of the Arts in the Vatican Museums, located in Rome, Italy. Along with The Patrons of the Arts membership, Haydu maintains that “Our sole interest is to assist the Holy Father [Pope] in his desire to preserve, promote and protect the wonderful and historic treasures found in the Vatican Museums

With Benny Hinn’s and Paula White’s statements in mind, Christian Research Service wrote the following letter to Mark Haydu and two staff members within the Patrons of the Arts program:

August 10, 2010

The Patrons of the Arts
in the Vatican Museums

Palazzo Apostolico, 
V-00120 Vatican City State, Europe
Tel: 011-39-06-698-81814 
Fax: 011-39-06-698-82147

To Whom it may concern:

Recently, the American televangelist Benny Hinn said he had been invited to the Vatican, and became a Patron of the Arts to maintain the work of Michelangelo.

Also, Benny Hinn said he was accompianied by a woman named Paula White, who said she traveled to Rome to meet with Vatican officials.

I am requesting your verification on the following:

1. Was Benny Hinn invited to the Vatican?
2. Did Benny Hinn become a Patron of the Arts?
3. Did Paula White meet with Vatican officials, and did she donate money?

Thank you. Your assistance will be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely in Christ,
Bud Press, Director
Christian Research Service
http://www.christianresearchservice.com
[End of letter]

In his reply on August 11, Mark Haydu stated that,

To my knowledge, Paula White or Benny Hinn were not invited to the Vatican Museums in any official context, nor did we find anyone on our donors database of Patrons under those names. [Original on file with CRS]

Haydu went on to say that because the Vatican employs thousands of people, he isn’t aware of everyone who is invited to the Vatican. “I am just aware of the Patrons of the Arts and the Vatican Museums,” he stated.

Christian Research Service thanks Mark Haydu for his prompt reply and honesty.

Closing comments:

Based on the information above, it appears that Benny Hinn and Paula White have, once again, deceived their followers. If those who follow the modern-day false teachers would develop an inquiring mind–the type that demands the truth–perhaps they would know that Hinn and White cannot be trusted.

Do not let kindness and truth leave you; bind them around your neck, write them on the tablet of your heart (Proverbs 3:3).

Related reading and viewing:

Source: Christian Research Services:

Read more about Benny Hinn’s trip to Rome.

Ulf Ekman: The pope is not an Antichrist and Rome not spiritual Babylon

«I do not believe that the Pope is an antichrist, nor that the Catholic Church is the whore of Babylon» .

Ulf Ekman is a Word of Faith teacher on his way back to Rome.

This is a statement from Ulf Ekman, head pastor at Livets Ord congregation in Upsala in Sweden. His is one of the leaders of the Global Pastoral ecumenical movement, that accepts Roman Catholic priests in the pulpit and minsters of ecumenical masses.

This is what Ekman writes in regards to the statement of Martin Luther, about the pope as an antichrist:

«This is not Biblical, and its not true. This view is a result of interpretation of Scripture that the Protestant Churches have been feed with for ages. antichrist has not yet surfaced. Antichrists has appeared in many different cultural settings, and you do not have to travel to Rome to find Spiritual derailment».

Also in regards to Mary, Ekman defend the Catholic position:

«We have done to much out of similarities between Nimrod, Semiramis and Tammus, in regards to Mary. Its important to see Mary in both the Old Covenant and the New Covenant as the Mother of our Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus took His humanity from Mary. This is the belief of both Catholics and Protestants».

Source: Blog of Ulf Ekman

My comment:

This personal letter of Ulf Ekman includes no Biblical reflections about where the reformers of the Church misunderstood scripture: Why did Martin Luther, Johan Calvin, John Wesley and all the other reformers call the pope an antichrist?

How could a Roman Catholic priest like Martin Luther have come to such a fatally wrong conclusion, in regards to the Vatican and their use of the Bible?

If the Pope was an antichrist at the time of Luther, when did the Vatican change?

Ulf Ekman`s defense of the Vatican is a political statement. You do not have to be a Pastor to understand that there  might be many antichrists around us.

But what is Ekman`s justification of the Papal system?

Ekmans answer is the need for «unity». There has to be unity in the body of Christ. When the Swedish pastor takes this view, He nullify the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. God the Son warned us about false teachers and prophets that would enter the Church. Paul even warns us about preachers trying to give us copies of «Jesus», and told us to have nothing to do with them.

2 Corinthians 11:4
For if someone comes to you and preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough.

Who are these men?

Can there be unity in a polluted body of Christ?

Will not the whole body corrupt, if we do not hold up the Scripture as the final authority in our Churches?

Has the Pope of Rome ever accepted that the Bible is the final authority?

Has the Pope ever accepted that man in justified by faith in Jesus alone?

Ekman is wrong. He is a false teacher that takes the Word of Faith Movement down the endtime road to Rome. Together the Word of Faith Movement and the Roman Catholic Church will worship the last and final antichrist as the Messiah. He will soon set up his throne in Jerusalem.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑