New Age Witch posted as Pastor in the Swedish army

Regina Birkehorn do not believe in a personal God, neither in Jesus. But she became an Army priest in the Lutheran Kingdom of Sweden.

To believe in healing in certain stones will neiter save witch turned Pastor Regina Birkehorn, nor the flock she is pastoring — To believe in healing in certain stones will neither save a New Age witch dressed up as a Pastor Regina Birkehorn, nor the flock she is pastoring

She believe in the divine energy and healing power of certain stones, and took her «priestess» education in Beloved Community i Oregon, USA. Still Regina Birkehorn (46) became a pastor in the army in he supposed to be Christian Lutheran Kingdom of Sweden.

– When I saw that the Swedish Home defense advertised a vacancy as army Pastor i submitted my application. That I was not a Christian was no problem. I have been very well received in the armed forces, explains Birkehorn.

Paganism is back in Sweden, promoted by priests like Sten lambert — Paganism is back in Sweden, promoted by priests like Sten Elmberg

Army priest Sten Elmberg is responsible for the relationship between the Church of Sweden and the Swedish armed forces. He downplays the importance of having Christians as pastors.
– Its not our duty to me missionaries, but to try to meet them and look after their special personal needs. Sweden is now a multicultural society. We have both Moslems, Hindus, Buddhists and Jews in our armed forces, explains Elmberg.

Source: UNT.se and the Swedish Christian daily: Dagen.se

My comment:

To have army Pastors who do not believe in God, is like having soldiers who do not believe in the army. You will get headless chicken.

To have a Christian Church who say that priests do not have to believe in Jesus, is like trying to keep flying an airplane that just lost its engine. Its going to crash very badly.

Jesus is surely not very impressed with Sten Elmberg:

John 8:24

«I told you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am the one I claim to be, you will indeed die in your sins»

August 19, 2009 3

The Koran confirms the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem

The Koran itself gives us the evidence of the destruction of the two Temples that had stood on the site of Al-Aksa.

The Jewish presence in and historic rights to Jeruslem is confirmed in the Koran. — The Jewish presence in and historic rights to Jerusalem is confirmed in the Koran.

This is a statement by Stephen Rosenberg, who is a fellow of the W.F. Albright Institute of Archeological Research in Jerusalem. Rosenberg quotes from the prophet Muhammad´s night journey.

Surah 17:

«Glory be to Him who made His servant go by night from the Sacred Temple [Mecca] to the farther Temple [Al-Aksa, Jerusalem], whose surroundings We have blessed… »

It goes on to say,

“We solemnly declared to the Israelites: Twice you shall commit great evil in the land… and We sent against you a formidable army which ravaged your land… and when the prophecy of your second transgression came to be fulfilled, We sent another army to afflict you and to enter the Temple, as the former entered it before»

The Koran itself gives us the evidence of the destruction of the two Temples that had stood on the site of Al-Aksa. Nothing could be clearer.

What evidence is there that a Jewish Temple was destroyed by the Babylonians?

There is a tablet in the British Museum that Nebuchadnezzar came to Jerusalem in his seventh year (597 BCE) and captured the city, but he destroyed no temple and only set up a «King of his own heart» (Zedekiah). The tablet goes up to the year 594 and then stops. The following years are missing and the next tablet restarts in 556 BCE. The crucial year 586 is lost.

But what about the great stones of the Temple compound, still visible today all around Haram al-Sharif, in the lower courses of the Western Wall and elsewhere?

Only Herod could have forced men to move such megaliths. Well no, the propaganda goes, after the Romans conquered Jerusalem, they had to set up their temple to Jupiter, and thus built this vast platform as its base. The Roman builders were the equal of Herod when it came to monumental structures, just look at the temples of Baalbek. And there is nothing on the Temple Mount to indicate that a Jewish Temple ever stood there.

The historian Josephus mentions that there was a stone at the southwest corner of the Temple Mount from which one of the priests would blow the trumpet on Friday afternoons to announce the start of the Sabbath. That stone has been found, with the Hebrew inscription «Lebeit hatekia»(to the place of trumpeting). No such stone would have graced the corner of a Roman temple.

Furthermore, the existence of the Second Temple is made clear from the New Testament and the stories of Jesus within the Temple complex. But then, the Islamists would say, those Christian documents were also written by Jews, maybe by Jews with a new belief in a savior. But still Jews who needed to aggrandize the miracles of their messiah in the context of his Jewish past.

Source: Jerusalem Post.

August 7, 2009 1

Tough Minister lady denies the Pope two bones of Danish king

«Burnt at stake. That would have been the tragic end of Birthe Rønn Hornbech if she had lived 500 years ago».

The Pope met his match in this Danish Church Affaris Minister — The Pope met his match in this Danish Church Affairs Minister

The Danish Minister of Church affairs has denied the Roman Catholic Church two bones they wanted to display as relics.

This is the bones of a Danish king, that the Roman Catholic Bishop Czeslaw Kozon of Denmark has been fighting for. The Papal Bishop has finally accepted that the Danish Minister of Church affairs did not permit the Catholic Church to use bones of the claimed to be «Saint Knud» as relics.

«This is a shame for us. But we could never demand. Only wish for these bones», explains Bishop Czeslaw Kozon.

The Lutheran Parish Council in St. Knud´s Church in Odense first gave permission to give two of the bones of the Danish saint to the Catholics. But the Lutheran Bishop Kresten Drejergaard of Fyn became a stumbling block for Rome. The Bishop revoked the permission. He found in neither ethical not theological correct, to give two bones from the Evangelical Lutheran Church to the Roman Catholic Church for the purpose of worship of relics.

The Danish Lutheran Bishops revocation, angered the Social Democrat politician Magnus Heunicke. He demanded an explanation from the Minister of Church affairs, Birthe Rønn Hornbech. She supported her Bishops views. The Catholic Church will not be given a rib bone and a foot bone as tools to be worshiped or adored.

Source: Danish Christian Daily «Kristelig Dagblad»

My comment:

Let me repeat a former comment on this emerging story:

To this rather «strange» dispute, I can only add that our saints are presently living among us, doing the will of the Lord. After people are dead, their Spirit and soul leaves the flesh, and depart either for Heaven or Hell. We should not pay attention to dead saints, and in particular not the bones they left behind.

This is an good example of how silly religious people might become.

That a Danish politician call up on the Minister of Church Affair to rebuke a Lutheran Bishop for the sake of two bones, makes this story even more Bizarre. Danish politician do not have much to do now a days, do they?

August 3, 2009 0

Danish priest: «There has never been a Palestinian state»

The Danish Palestinian Friendship Association do not understand why Muslims have to recognize the state of Israel. Well, thats the reason why there has never been a Palestinian state.

Trying to convince the Danes that Israel is the real problem — Fathi El-Abed is trying to convince the Danes that Israel is the real problem. Not Islamic lies in regards to the Jewish people and Jerusalem.

This is the reply from the Danish priest Hans Kristian Neerskov to a editorial letter from Fathi El-Abed in the Danish Christian Daily «Dagen». Fathi El-Abed is the leader of the Danish Palestinian Friendship Association.

The United Nations resolution 181 from 29th of November 1947, saw 57 membership nations voting «yes». Only 13 nations voted against, and 11 decided not to vote. This resolution demanded that both the Jews and the Arabs established their own states in the British mandate area of «Palestine». These two state had to be democratic, had to recognize each otter, and give mutual commitment to each otter of living in peaceful relations with each other.

The Arab Palestinians have never accepted this UN resolution. This is the reason why there is no «Palestinian» statehood today. If the Arabs had accepted this resolution, they could have had their own state today. But they do not want. Because their do not want there to be a Jewish state.

Hans Kristian Neerskov is a danish priest that speaks the truth

Israel accepted United Nation resolution 181. Even though the resolution was unfair to the Jewish people. Why? Because already 77 per cent of the British mandate area had bin given to Abdullah Hussein, so he could form the state of Transjordan. Which means: «On the other side of Jordan». Today, the Kingdom of Jordan. So this kingdom is one of the 14 homelands of the so-called Palestinian people.

Another valid point for Israel, is that United Nation resolution 181 would be very difficult to defend. Because the Jewish homeland would be only 16 kilometer wide just north of Tel Aviv. Another Jewish challenge was that this resolution limited their access to Jerusalem, because of special British imposed rules to protect the interest of Islam. The Jews found this unfair, because under no time or circumstances in the prophet Mohammad`s life, was Jerusalem of any importance for him. This city was captured by Islam long time after the prophets death in 653 A.D, and occupied by Islam up to 1099 A.D. Islam built to mosques in Jerusalem.

There has never been a Palestinian government anywhere in the World. There have never existed a Palestinian currency, nor a country with the name Palestine. The Islamic claim to the «historic Palestine» is just a fiction. During the time of the British mandate, the United Kingdom chose to call this land for «Palestine». This is the root of the problem. Even during the Islamic rule from 654 to 1099, there was never any local Palestinian government. And the final fact: After the destruction of the second Jewish temple in Jerusalem, the Roman Empire decided to call their province «Palestine».

Source: Letter to the editor,The Danish Christian Daily «Kristelig Dagblad».

July 31, 2009 1