If Israel looses a war, it will cease to exist

When a country loses a war it faces a few years of rebuilding and recovery. If and when Israel loses a war it will simply cease to exist.

IDF_women — Two Jewish women serves in the IDF to protect the state of Israel. They must not fail.

Any country has the right to defend itself from attack. Israel has even more right to do so than any other country on earth. The simple reason is that when a country loses a war it faces a few years of rebuilding and recovery. If and when Israel loses a war it will simply cease to exist.

One frequently overlooked fact about the killing in Dubai is that there have already been arrests – of two Palestinians in Jordan who have been extradited to Dubai.

Even if the killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was indeed done by those «pesky» Israelis, and not the result of a Hamas power struggle or an assassination carried out by one of the many Arab groups who loathe the Islamist Hamas with as much passion as the Israelis, were they right to do it?

Frankly, I find it hard to understand anyone who doesn’t realize that it’s one fewer terrorist planning murderous attacks on civilians. Al-Mabhouh was personally responsible for the murder of IDF soldiers in the ’80s and was, by all accounts, in Dubai to arrange an arms deal with the main Hamas sponsor, Iran.

Source: Independent-Ireland.

My comment:

Israel has won all the Middle East wars for one simple reason. God of Israel is the guardian of the restoration of the Jewish people in their God given homeland in the Middle East.

The Messiah Jesus serves his Father, God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. He will soon return. But not before the Jewish people have been betrayed one more time. And this time, by all the nations on Earth. The Jewish people will shout in pain, and welcome Him.

Israel shall not be destroyed. Israel shall be saved. Amen.

Written by Ivar

First published: 24.02.2010.

October 2, 2011 9

Dear Cardinal: We have found the Nazis of the Middle East

A cardinal and his pope — Cardinal Martino tells lies about Israel.

A Vatican Cardinal should know better than using such words:

«The people of Gaza live in a big concentration camp».

He has become a victim of the lies, manipulations and deceptions of Radical Islam. Or he simply do not want to listen.

Cardinal Renato Martino, recently used these words when he pointed his finger at Israel. Martino is the head of the Vatican Council for Justice and Peace.

Lets take a closer look at the true Fascists of the Middle East.

Here are some striking examples of similarities between the Nazis in Germany and Hamas who rule in Gaza.

Both used violence to come to power:

Adolf Hitler set the Reichstag in Berlin on fire on 27th February 1993, and took over the office of the Chancellor of the Reich.

Hamas took control over the Governmental offices in Gaza in a bloody military cup on 15th of June 2007.

Both arrested their opponents and executed them without mercy:

The German Nazi-police have arrested Jews on the event of the Kristallnacht 10th of November 1938. Many of them did not survive the Holocaust.

Hamas arrested members of the rival group Fatah during the bloody military cup. Some of them were executed by being thrown off the roof tops in Gaza.

Both executes innocent people:

A Nazi soldier has hanged three Jews during World War II.

Hamas execute their own children in a Holy War. In the same way Nazi-jugend died like flies during World War II.

Both burns and destroys items of people they hate:

An German police officer burns Jewish books after the Nazis took control over Germany in 1933 .

Hamas burn what ever Jewish they can get their hands on.

Both use manipulation to control the masses:

Adolf Hitler overlooks his subjects. He convinced them, that the Jews were the bad guys. And that he was the true lover of peace.

A Hamas soldier overlooks their subjects in Gaza. The people of Gaza have been told that the Jews are the problem, and that Jihad will bring peace.

Both salute their leaders in the same manner:

Neo-Nazis give their honor to Adolf Hitler.

Just like Hamas and Hizbullah:

During the anti-Racism conference in Geneva i April, the supporters of the Iranian president shouted «Zio-Nazis» to the Jewish observers.

Muslim women in Islamabad display that the Iranian delegation are liars. They are the one who uses Nazi-methods against the Jews.

The Jews will never in a million years ask anyone to bless the Nazi-leader of World War II.

Dear Cardinal.

If we dont support Israel`s right to self-defense against Radical Islam, Hamas will surely establish concentration camps…The first one, for their own people in Gaza…

Click here:

Read more about how the Vatican in working for «World Peace» with the Arabs, in the similar way the Vatican worked with men like Mussolini and Hitler:

If you need more views on the difference between a concentration camp and Gaza, you can read this:

Click here:

First published: May 4th, 2009.

September 21, 2011 16

British Colonel: Israel must hold on to military control of the “West Bank”

NATO-troops can not safeguard the borders of the state of Israel.

Palestinians wait to cross the Hawara checkpoint on the outskirts of the West Bank city of Nablus — Only Israeli soldiers can keep the Jewish state safe. Her from a checkpoint outside Nablus.

This is a statement of colonel Richard Kemp, who is an International security adviser.

He writes:

To stand any real chance of success, every insurgent or terrorist movement needs a safe haven to operate from. Israel has had more than a flavor of what it can mean to leave hostile groups in control of lands adjacent to its own borders in southern Lebanon and in Gaza. Any similar move to totally cede control to the Palestinians of the West Bank or a part of Jerusalem would carry immense risk.

425px-afghan_082 — British Colonel Richard Kemp

Some might argue that a modern high-tech state can monitor hostile activities outside its borders. But surveillance and intelligence collection against a deeply embedded, secretive, extremist network operating within a dense civilian population is the most difficult target, and no national intelligence organization can be confident that it will have a high success rate against such a target.

It has been suggested that an international force, perhaps a NATO force, should replace the IDF presence in the West Bank, an idea that raises a number of very serious questions.

Where are the NATO troops going to come from and how long are they going to stay?

Some nations are simply not prepared to put their troops into undue danger.

What would happen to those who were prepared to take part in such a force when the going got tough, as it inevitably would?

Think of Lebanon in 1983 when suicide bomb attacks killed 300 troops and led to the withdrawal of the French and American peacekeeping forces, or al-Qaeda’s attack in Madrid which led to the withdrawal of Spanish forces from the Iraq campaign.

Just how sure could we be that the electorates in contributing countries would allow their militaries to remain deployed in the West Bank under these kinds of pressures.

To what extent would a NATO mission get in the way of a vital Israeli effort to protect their own people?

Finally, a failed NATO mission and a West Bank under extremist control, flourishing under a security vacuum there, would encourage and strengthen violent jihadists everywhere in the world.

Source: JCPA. org.

Read more about Richard Kemp’s take on the security of Israel.

First published: August 24th, 2010.

September 20, 2011 1

Accepting ‘67 lines for talks, Netanyahu leaves Biblical Zionism

From “indefensible borders”, the PM of Israel is now ready to talk about Israel’s destruction.

Obama won an important victory for Islam, by forcing Netanyahu to talk based on an accept of a withdrawal to the 1967-lines.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week made a new move to try to outflank the Palestinians.

On August second, Netanyahu said he said Israel is ready to use the pre-1967 lines as a rough starting point for discussion of a Palestinian state – if the Palestinians recognize Israel as the Jewish state and back down from their plan to petition the United Nations for statehood recognition in September.

Analysts are divided over whether this constitutes a real shift for Netanyahu or whether he’s merely trying to call the Palestinians’ bluff and gain the upper hand in the international arena — and at home.

On the one hand, merely articulating this new position appears to be a significant shift for the prime minister, who initially described those borders as “indefensible” when President Obama suggested in May that the pre-1967 lines — with agreed land swaps — should serve as the starting point for talks.

“It’s a very serious move,” said Bar-Ilan University political scientist Eytan Gilboa, a senior researcher at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies. “For him it’s quite a concession to make because after Obama proposed his platform for renewing negotiations, Bibi rejected it. So he has changed his tune.”

Source: JTA.org

My comment:

Under pressure, Benjamin Netanyahu is no longer a man of solid principles. This is best displayed in his turnaround in regards to the 67′-lines.

A border that was “indefensible” in May, will surely be the same today.

Ariel Sharon did a similar turnaround in regards to Jewish properties in Gaza. When the new borders of Gaza was accepted, Jews lost their properties in Gush Katif. The “moderate” PLO moved in. But the new Jew free zone in Gaza was qucikly transformed into a not controllable Islamic terror state.

That is what will happen to Judea and Samaria, and East Jerusalem, the day Netanyahy’s new principle becomes the “peace policy” of Israel, “Palestine” and the United Nations.

The Israeli surrender to an enforced “peace plan” is just around the corner.

Written by Ivar

August 11, 2011 5