Pope Francis “confirms Vatican gay lobby and corruption”

Pope Francis reportedly made the remarks during a private audience with other cleric.

The last Pope walked in female garments and his shining read shoes.

Pope Francis is reported to have acknowledged the existence of a “gay lobby” inside the Vatican.

He also said there was a “stream of corruption”, according to reports in Catholic media.

He is said to have made the remarks during a private meeting with a group of Latin American Catholic clerics.

The clerics wrote up a report of the conversation that then appeared on the Chilean website Reflection and Liberation.
According to the report, the Pope was extremely open as he discussed problems at the Vatican.

He is said to have told the Latin American delegation that there were good, holy men in the administration, but that there was also corruption.

The Vatican would have to “see what we can do” about the “gay lobby” operating in the bureaucracy, he said. “It is true, it is there,” the report quotes him as saying.

In the days leading up to Pope Benedict XVI’s resignation in February, the Italian media carried many un-sourced reports that gay Vatican clergymen had been working together to advance their personal interests, leaving the Holy See vulnerable to blackmail.

Source: The BBC

My comment;

The existence of a gay lobby of bishops and cardinals in the Vatican, must be one of the most obvious secrets revealed by the new Pope.

The lats Pope him self was walking around is red shores and female clothing, and could obviously have been the “Lord of sodomy” him self.

When you build a religious movements that deny priests to marry, this religious institution will be attracted by gay men. The Vatican priesthood has power over the flock of faithful Roman Catholics,, and sexual abuses have taken place in their tens of thousands.

Romans 1: 21-27
For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.

Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshipped and served created things rather than the Creator – who is for ever praised. Amen.

Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

The Bible explains the reason for the widespread sexual perversion inside the Roman Catholic Church. The fruit of 1500 years of doctrinal errors, has led this movement towards the wide gates of destruction.

If you want to escape the gates of Hell, you have to renounce this movement and run for your life.
Be wise. Repent or perish.

Written by Ivar

June 13, 2013 3

Thousand’s in Australia abused by Roman Catholic priests

Campaigners say the true number of abuse victims could be up to 10,000.

The Archbishop of Melbourne, Denis Hart, described the figures as “horrific and shameful”.
The Roman Catholic Church in the Australian state of Victoria has confirmed that more than 600 children have been sexually abused by its priests since the 1930s.

They were released in a submission to a state parliamentary inquiry into the handling of abuse cases.
Campaigners say the true number of abuse victims could be up to 10,000.

In its submission, the church said the 620 cases went back 80 years with the majority taking place between the 1960s and the 1980s. It says it is still investigating a further 45 cases.

In a statement, Archbishop Hart said it was important to be open “about the horrific abuse that has occurred in Victoria and elsewhere”.

“We look to this inquiry to assist the healing of those who have been abused, to examine the broad context of the church’s response, especially over the last 16 years, and to make recommendations to enhance the care for victims and preventative measures that are now in place,” the statement said.

My comment: The BBC

The worst thong a Christian can encounter is not a pagan. But a false Christian. Someone who has sold his soul to the devil, but do his work in the name of “Jesus”.

That is exactly what Roman Catholic priests do.

They have been told the truth, knows the truth, but have rejected it.

All who stay put inside the Roman Catholic religious system, live with a constant risk of having their children abused by some of these perverts. And all who accept Roman Catholicism as true Christianity becomes equally guilty of these crimes.

Many pastors who serve in Baptists and Pentecostal Churches have deleted the Reformation. Thy are ready to accept the Papacy as anything but a seat of an antichrist.

First published: September 24th, 2012.

Written by Ivar

November 13, 2012 7

Bible lesson # 14: Timothy´s mother the ideal pastor for the Church

Who raised Timothy in faith? Why did God chose a married woman judge to rule Israel? Why do some Christian leaders hide the teaching talents of the daughters of Jesus?

A mans World, denying female pastorship. Not even permitting them to get married.

What I am about to tell you, will steer up many Catholics and many claimed to be conservative Christians. I dont care. Let the Word of God be my only judge.

1. Timothy 2:12
«I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.»

The out of context use of this verse of the Bible has made mainstream Christianity into a «kindergarten for men». But was that Pauls intention? I am not only doubtful, I am sure that Paul promoted women in scriptural leadership. And I will quote scriptures to plead my understanding of Paul.

First, lets see what Paul did not write:

«God do not permit». The whole start of this letter to Timothy is full of «I do». Other places Paul claims to speak on behalf of God or the Lord. Here he seems to speak about some kind of bad experiences, that has made him come to such a conclusion.

Lets remove the word «man» with the word «male children». And lets see what happens:

1. Timothy 2:12
I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over male children; she must be silent.

This can obviously not be the case, since all mothers are the first teachers of their own children.

Let replace the word «man» with «husband», and let see whats happen:

1. Timothy 2:12
I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over her husband; she must be silent.

Now, this will make sense. The Bible says that the man (husband) is the head of the House. But he has to love his wife, as Christ loved the Church. And since Jesus was willing to die for his Church, a man (husband) must become a slave of his wife. If that hurts your male ego, you have to go back to Jesus, repent and start obeying the Word of God.

There was a lot of disturbance in the Church of Corinth. This might have inspired Paul to put some restrictions on wife’s quarreling with their husbands. In special inside the Church, during fellowship.

Since the Bible can not contradict it self, we need to read the message of Paul in the right context.

1. Timothy 2:12
I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over children; she must be silent.

If he ment that a woman can never teach a male, than the mother of Timothy her self sinned against the Word of God. Because she raised Timothy in faith, and even made him understand the scriptures from his infancy.

2 Timothy 3:15
«and how from infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus».

Thats a good Bible teachers job. A woman, and even a believing grandmother was the first born in Timothys family.

2 Timothy 1:5
«I have been reminded of your sincere faith, which first lived in your grandmother Lois and in your mother Eunice and, I am persuaded, now lives in you also».

If God did not enable and allowed these two women to tech Timothy, his Bible knowledge from infancy would have been an impossibility.

What about the father of Timothy?

Well, the Bible is almost silent about him.

Act 16:1
«He came to Derbe and then to Lystra, where a disciple named Timothy lived, whose mother was a Jewess and a believer, but whose father was a Greek».

Well, since the Bible explains that the mother and grandmother of Timothy had come to faith, I guess his Greek father had not. He would simply not be able to teach his son the meaning of the scripture.

Since the mother of Timothy could teach her son the scripture from infancy, I guess she would be permitted to teach his also in his youth? What about the mother of Timothy teaching her own husband, the day he came to faith? Since she with almost hundred per cent surely would be more learned in the Word of God than her husband?

The mother and grandmother of Timothy are only two of many examples of great female teachers in the Bible. I guess Mary the Mother of Jesus was His first teacher of the Jewish scriptures?

Many of those who are against woman giving pastoral care to a church, does not understand that the word pastor is of latin origin, not the original Biblical language. The Hebrew word for pastor is shepherd.

And there is a woman pastor even in the Old Testament:

Genesis 29:9
«While he was still talking with them, Rachel came with her father’s sheep, for she was a shepherdess».

The wife of Jacob, the father of the 12 tribes of Israel, was what all Biblical women is called to become: A female pastor. Because we are all priests in the new testament Royal Priesthood. The old exclusive male priesthood of Aroon has passed away in the new covenant.

Daughters of Jesus. Stand up for your biblical birth rights.

June 24, 2012 20