“We will not tolerate nuclear weapons in North Korea”.
George W. Bush did not walk the talk.
In a blunt message to North Korea, US and Japan have demanded a “complete, verifiable and irreversible elimination” of Pyongyang’s nuclear weapons programme, advancing efforts to forge a united front on the issue.
“We will not tolerate nuclear weapons in North Korea. We will not settle for anything less than the complete, verifiable and irreversible elimination of North Korea’s nuclear weapons programme,” President George W Bush told reporters in a joint appearance with Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi on Friday.
This kind of baloney statement from George W. Bush was much worse than the non sense from all the “peace makers” who in 1938 presented Adolf Hitler as an “European statesman”.
British Prime Minister Nevil Chaimberlain did not have the military power to stop Nazi-Germany in 1938. The reason was the United States refusal to act on European discord, and serious disagreements with Communist Russia.
In 2003, President George W. Bush had “the military options” on the table in regards to North Korea. Later he entered into the political scrap yard, as the mother of all bluff makers.
It is a trap for Israel to put her trust in the USA. Israel must trust her God, and act.
On the move for Saudi women to be allowed to drive, Kerry was careful not to appear to take sides.
John Kerry and prince Faisal agree that Saudi women do best not driving.
What should be a ridiculous question is raised by Secretary of State John Kerry’s offensive obeisance to the Saudis yesterday when visiting Riyadh. Here is the AP story:
“On the move for Saudi women to be allowed to drive, Kerry was careful not to appear to take sides. Noting that while the United States embraces gender equality, ‘it is up to Saudi Arabia to make its own decisions about its own social structure and choices and the timing of whatever events.'”
Apparently, far be it from us to criticize Saudi repression of women and the ludicrous and offensive practice of preventing women from driving. How far does Secretary Kerry go with this “your own decisions about your own social structure?” Does it matter to him that “Saudis” don’t get to make that decision — because the country has no democratic institutions whatsoever?
Mr. Kerry’s abandonment of American standards when addressing the Saudi leaders was not only offensive, it was useless and unneeded.
When his predecessor Condoleezza Rice used to visit there, she refused to cover her hair as current Saudi practices demand; they got over it. Had Mr. Kerry replied,
“Well, as an American of course I think that rule about driving is ridiculous,” do we think they’d have declared war?
Muslim women who reject Sharia laws do not have the support of John Kerry.
Kerry was speaking with Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal, a graduate of Princeton University who also went to prep school in the United States.
Does the secretary believe that Saud actually thinks women should not be permitted to drive, and that saying so would have offended him?
Does the secretary think he increases respect for the United States when he refuses to defend our view of equality before the law?
The Saudi episode came a day after Kerry made an inaccurate and unfortunate statement about Egypt: that it is moving toward democracy under army rule. In an editorial, The Washington Post said it all:
“A Freedom House report released Monday concludes that ‘there has been virtually no substantive progress toward democracy … since the July 3 coup,’ despite the military regime’s supposed ‘road map.’
But that’s not how Secretary of State John F. Kerry sees it.
‘The road map is being carried out to the best of our perception,’ he pronounced during a quick trip to Cairo on Sunday. A liberal constitution and elections? ‘All of that is, in fact, moving down the road map in the direction that everybody has been hoping for.’
John Kerry seems to have chosen a US Foreign strategy based on the concept of saying absolutely nothing understandable at all, or at least nothing that can be taken as an offense by Islamic leaders.
Kerry stays within the parameters of the Sharia law, as desired by his boss, Barack Hussein Obama.
Google has expressed outrage following a report that the US National Security Agency (NSA) has hacked its data links.
The present regime in Washington D.C is headed by a hard core cyber criminal.
An executive at Google said it was not aware of the alleged activity, adding there was an “urgent need for reform”.
The comments follow a Washington Post report based on leaks from Edward Snowden claiming that the NSA hacked links connecting data centres operated by Google and Yahoo.
The NSA’s director said it had not had access to the companies’ computers.
Gen Keith Alexander told Bloomberg TV: “We are not authorised to go into a US company’s servers and take data.”
But correspondents say this is not a direct denial of the latest claims.
The revelations stem from documents leaked by ex-US intelligence contractor Edward Snowden, who has been granted temporary asylum in Russia and is wanted in the US in connection with the unauthorised disclosures.
The documents say millions of records were gleaned daily from the internet giants’ internal networks.
They suggest that the NSA intercepted the data at some point as it flowed through fibre-optic cables and other network equipment connecting the companies’ data centres, rather than targeting the servers themselves.
Who should the account holders of Google and Yahoo take to court?
Would the US Attorney General hold the NSA directors accountable, and request a judge to send them to jail?
The NSA hackers on Washington’s payroll, should be punished in court, and sentenced to long terms imprisonment.
You must be willing to believe in fairytales, if you believe that Barack Hussein Obama did not authorize criminal theft of private communications of dozens of World leaders. The US President is a hard core cyber criminal. The US Congress should start impeachment proceedings, and remove him from office.
ivarfjeld.com 