Clinton wanted CIA to arm Islamic Jihad

Hillary Clinton conferred privately with David Petreaus to join forces with Islamic Jihad in Syria.

The foemer CIA boss and Hillary Clinton suggested a support of Islamic Jihad in Syria.

Last summer, as the fighting in Syria raged and questions about U.S. inaction grew, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton conferred privately with David Petraeus, the director of the CIA, about joining forces on a plan to arm the Syrian resistance.

The idea was to vet the rebel groups and train fighters, who would be supplied with weapons. The plan offered the potential of creating Syrian allies with whom the U.S. could work after Assad’s eventual removal.
Clinton and Petraeus presented the proposal to the White House, according to administration officials. But with the White House worried about the risks, and with President Obama in the midst of a re-election bid, they were rebuffed.

Source: New York Times

My comment:

The NATO-Islamic Jihad nexus lead to the fall of a brutal military regime in Libya. The fruits of this military collaboration became toxic. The American ambassador died when Islamic forces attacked the US Consulate in Bengazi.

We need to question if Hillary Clinton overall, did have the correct world view. Did she understand the spiritual nature of the treat, the US forces are facing?

Did Clinton understand that the same Islamic forces fighting a brutal dictatorship in Syria, are the same forces who killed the US ambassador?

I do not think she ever did.

Why should the US arm Islamic terrorists, who attack Russian interests in Syria, and not expect more Islamic violence against American targets?

Its like feeding Satan, and feel that you have done a good deal. And in the very next moment find your self under deadly attacks.

Supporters of evil, repent. You are on your way through the wide gates that leads to destruction. May Jesus the Messiah have mercy on all deceived souls. Amen.

Written by Ivar

February 5, 2013 0

Human Right Watch accept Jew-hate

Human Right Watch leader refuses to label Iran’s calls to erase Israel.

The leader of Human Right Watch is not willing to condemn Iranian Jew-hate. — The leader of Human Right Watch Kenneth Roth is not willing to condemn Iranian Jew-hate.

The Wall Street Journal’s David Feith, as assistant editorial features editor with the paper, obtained internal HRW emails and published last week a report, headlined “Dancing around genocide,”.

He wrote about alleged HRW bias against Israel and an internecine conflict within HRW’s top leadership about the group’s head, Kenneth Roth, and his failure to take Iran’s calls to destroy Israel seriously.

The Journal reported that Sid Sheinberg, HRW’s vice chairman, wrote in an email, “Sitting still while Iran claims a ‘justification to kill all Jews and annihilate Israel’ is…a position unworthy of our great organization.”

According to the newspaper, Roth wrote in one email, “Many of [Iran’s] statements are certainly reprehensible, but they are not incitement to genocide. No one has acted on them.”

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has stated that “Israel must be wiped off the map,” while former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani has openly contemplated firing a nuclear missile at Tel Aviv.

Roth told the Journal that, although a committee may look into Iran’s anti-Israel rhetoric, he believes the country is not inciting genocide against the Jewish state. Instead, he argued, the push to label Tehran’s calls for Israel’s destruction as genocidal is “part of an effort to beat the war drums against Iran.”

In an email to The Jerusalem Post on Saturday, Prof. Gerald M. Steinberg, the head of the Jerusalem-based NGO Monitor, wrote, “This is a blatant example of Roth’s indifference to genocidal threats and human rights abuses when these target Israel.”

“Roth, who has controlled Human Rights Watch since 1996, has consistently demonstrated a obsession with attacking the Jewish state, and the people he selected to lead HRW’s Middle East and North Africa division are also infected with this deep bias,” Steinberg wrote.

“While Gaddafi was ranting against the Zionists, HRW embraced the regime as ‘human rights reformers.’ HRW’s studied silence in the face of Iran’s genocidal threats further demonstrates this organization’s moral bankruptcy.”

Source: Jerusalem Post

My comments:

One of the grave errors in modern world history, was the International failure to confront Hitlers promise to find a “total solution” to the “Jew-problem”.

If Human Right Watch (HRW) had existed 80 years ago, they would have found no fault in the Nazi-party’s ideology based on Jew-hate. The HRW would have branded critics of Hitler as “war mongers”, who tried to use Hitlers antisemitic statements as an excuse to militarize Europe.

Such is the nature of Fascism. They blame their critics to be the real “Fascists”. History repeat it self. Those who excuse the Islamic Republic of Iran, would be the same who would have excused a man like Adolf Hitler.

Written by Ivar

December 10, 2012 1

Bankruptable US borrows 125 Billion USD a month

The US has “only” 375 Billion USD worth of gold. The US debts can not be paid back in gold.

AN EMPLOYEE SHOWS A GOLD BAR AT A JEWELRY STORE IN TOKYO — Long time ago, the US dollar was linked to the value of the American reserves of gold. If the US goes bankrupt, you will not get anything for your dollars.

How will the US pay back its 14 trillion USD state debt?

The U.S. borrows USD 125 billion per month. To start selling assets sold would only buy the Americans a limited amount of time.

According to WGC data, the U.S. possesses the most gold globally in terms of percentage of foreign reserves and tonnage. Nearly seventy-five percent of its reserves are in gold, and it has 8,133.5 tons of gold.

George Milling-Stanley is the managing director, government affairs, for the World Gold Council.

“If we sold all of our gold, that would be USD 375 billion. So we’d run out of money in August and we’d have no asset to borrow against. It’s just a drop in the bucket. The problem is the debts are in the trillions. The basic point is it’s not a smart thing to do,” he said.

Of all the troubled southern-tier European countries, Portugal has the greatest percentage share held in gold of total foreign reserves. According to the most recent calculation of world gold holdings, Portugal has 81 per cent of its total foreign reserves in gold, at 382.5 metric tons. That figure is calculated by the World Gold Council using International Monetary Fund’s International Financial Statistics.

By tonnage, Italy has the most reserves of the PIIGS, at 2,451.8 tons, which is 69.2 per cent of its reserves, and is the fourth-largest holder of gold globally, behind the U.S., the IMF and Germany. Greece has 111.5 tons of gold, which is 79.3 per cent of its reserves and Ireland has 6 tons, which is 13.3 per cent of its reserves.

Source: Commodityonline.com

When the gold is gone, how to pay back the debt?

German top politician suggested Greece hand over some island to German occupation.

Lets take a look at the ongoing debate:

Greek Prime Minister Georges Papandreou has said privatisations are now one of his government’s top priorities.

But he lashed back at proposals by some German politicians that Greece give up one of its islands or a historical monument as a warranty for fresh loans.

“To ask us for an island or a monument as a warranty is almost an insult,” Papandreou told the Italian daily Corriere della Sera in an interview published on Saturday.

“The Greek state must sell stakes in companies and also assets such as, for example, unpopulated islands,” Frank Schäffler, a member of parliament for the pro-business Free Democrats, told the Bild daily.

Marco Wanderwitz, an MP for Merkel’s own conservative Christian Democrats, said Athens should provide collateral for any money it receives from the European Union to help it out of its debt crisis.

“In this case, certain Greek islands also come into question,” added Wanderwitz

Source: Thelocal.de

My comment:

The US has a lot of land. Since the state of California is sinking into the abyss of debt, China will most likely not attach Hollywood as repayment.

But Alaska is a hot asset, and can even be given as a future debt swap to both Russia and China.

Saudi Arabia wants Israel in exchange. The problem is that some Jews do still feel Obama is not the caretaker of their land, and can not hand Israel over to Islam.

Written by Ivar

May 27, 2011 1