President Barack Obama’s handling of the Iranian nuclear deal is a symbol of the coming of the end of times and the “imminent” return of Jesus Christ.

These are the words of former Republican congresswoman Michele Bachmann in a recent radio interview.
Bachmann explained that if Obama and the United States turn their back on Israel, this would bring severe “curses” upon the United States, similar to those seen in the end of days.
But, Bachmann is not afraid of the end of days, rather she says that “these are the most exciting days in history” because nothing is more important than the return of Jesus Christ.
“We need to be so on fire right now about the things of Christ and the things of God, that needs to occupy our time and our thoughts virtually from morning to night because we have very little time — in my opinion — left before the second return of Christ. That’s good news!” the former congresswoman said. “The world is embracing degeneracy, but what that also tells us as we look at what the world is doing that they’re going according to God’s time clock. Pastors, preach it from the pulpit!”
“If we actually turn our back on Israel as we have seen Barack Obama do today, if that happens then I think we will see a scale and a level of push back in the United States, negative consequences,” Bachmann told Understanding the Times radio host Jan Markell on Sunday. “I don’t know what they are, but I believe that the Bible is true. And believe what the Bible says is that our nation and the people of our nation will reap a whirlwind, and we could see economic disasters, natural disasters.”
Source: Jerusalem Post
My comment:
Michele Bachmann would be a better President for the American people, than Hillary Clinton. Bachmann is honest, and speaks the truth also about the “peace deal” with Iran.
The Clintons have always sided with Islam, and wants to bring Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem back under Islamic occupation.
The sad story about Hillary Clinton, is that most apostate Christians accept her as a sister in faith. Because the was brought up in a family of Methodists. Clinton also carries a New Testament in her hand bag. But all who believe in replacement theology have been deceived. The “Christ” who sides with Islam in the battle for Israels survival is not the Messiah of the Bible.
The apostle Paul warns us about copycat “Christ’s” that will lead us astray.
2 Corinthians 11:4
For if someone comes to you and preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the Spirit you received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough.
Do not be one of them who fall into deception. Jesus the Messiah is God. He is the author of the eternal promises to the Jewish people. They are the only true caretakers of Zion, the state of Israel.
Written by Ivar
the verse quoted reveals so much. There are indeed other Christ’s, those who teach of them will reap their reward. Also it reveals that their is more than one gospel. Gospel means “good news”. So someone can bring good news but no necessarily the good news that Christ preached.
Paul also says in the same verse that if someone preaches a gospel other than the one first received. It is important then to listen carefully or read carefully and then follow Paul’s advice, be like the Jews of Berea, study the scriptures to see if what is being taught is fully supported by Gods Word.
Dear Alistair
Shalom, and love in Jesus.
Thanks for this comment. Yes, there are different “Christs” and different gospel. The persons who preach such stuff walk in a false Holy Spirit. It might look so nice, and feel so good….
I don’t think the pope will like her attitude. The media will brand her a Christian fundamental extremist for suggesting the bible is true. The voting box programmers will skew the vote for someone else.
Dear Ed Jones
Shalom, and love in Jesus.
The Roman Catholics in the US will not vote for Michelle Bachmann. So she will never be nominated as the President candicate of the Republican Party. Strangely enough, the so-called “Christian conservatives” do not mind a Mormon in the White House.
How do you know? The media says who we like and don’t like. They will show you the polls to prove it too.
You are, no doubt, correct, Ed. There is a lot of hostility, in the halls of power, toward Christians, in these last of the last days. The reigning powers will manipulate the left-leaning media to make sure that she doesn’t have the smallest chance to even win the nomination, let alone the Presidency. But she does represent the right-wing Tea Party faction of the Republican Party, so they will be somewhat gracious to her, as a way of quelling internal conflict within the party. The “moderates” in control of the Republican Party must always cast a wary eye on the right of the party and avoid offending them, because they know that they need the votes of the Christians and libertarians on the right. There are some supposed Christians in the Democratic Party, but several key moral issues (Democratic insistence on abortion and gay marriage) have, for a long time, offended conservative Christians and kept them in the Republican Party. The failure of the “moderates” to address moral issues, caused a number of Christians, libertarians and other conservatives to form the Tea Party.
The Democratic Party is largely (and legitimately) seen by the right as the “party of the degenerates” and they currently are firmly in control of Washington. It is difficult to imagine any moral conservative getting even close to winning the presidency. Rand Paul is a more serious contender than Bachmann, so the left will focus their most vicious attacks on him. But he likely doesn’t stand much of a chance either. I think Bachmann is right and the closer the U.S. comes to abandoning Israel, the closer it comes to disaster.
That’s all sort of complicated. I just look for the circle like sun halo the catholics put behind their saints. I saw it behind Obama’s head and knew he would win.
I would never under any circumstances vote for Mrs. Clinton. I would however, vote for Mrs,.Bachman. I don’t think she is playing the “Christian card”.
Ivar said, “The “Christ” who sides with Islam in the battle for Israels survival is not the Messiah of the Bible” Amen and amen! .
They don’t really need to side with Islam after Obama. He’s weakend the middle east countries and strengthened Iran. All they have to do is pull America out of the middle east and it will fit with the official story, Iran backed terrorists take over the middle east and are sitting on Israels doorstep. In comes the anti-christ to make a peace deal, perhaps with the UN behind him, maybe he will want to set up shop in Jerusalem as part of the peace deal.
Will it be Hillary who the media are already touting as poor at foreign poicy and ready to drive a VW bus across America in a 60″s style peace rally. Or will they choose a Republican for to lay the blame.
Who do you see as having the “halo” Ed? I’m wondering if it will be Marco Rubio? The media has already reported that he has spoken before the Council on Foreign Relations. That is an extremely important step in the process. He’s short though. BUT, if the Dems select Hilary (and unless she messes up BIG, the nomination is hers), then Rubio’s height is irrelevant. To me, Rubio is looking like the one that the big shots have selected.
Mark Everson has some red flags. Yale guy with ties to Bush.
My Grandfather was a Methodist Preacher “Circuit Rider” on a horse for many years preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ. He did not preach “Replacement Theology” or any other such Doctrine of man. I have a few copies of his Sermons. He was on my Mother’s side of the family. My Grandfather on my father’s side was a Pentecostal Preacher it is hard to tell the difference between either.The only difference is the “examples of the current times & Presidential Leaders & the goings on in America. No electricity or cars with one and 2 World Wars with the other. But the Gospel of Jesus Christ was preached with the same fervor and dedication unto the Lord and great desire to snatch any from the flames of Hell if they were so bent on going there. Deeply believed prayer was and is vital in any and all relationships, walks of life. Without Jesus you are ” Kindling Wood” to keep the flames of Hell burning, So Repent My precious deceived ones and accept the gift of life Jesus Christ offers you and believe Him stay in His Word without Him we all are lost.
The gifts are like “Change in your pocket” they jingle and draw attention….((yet they are important and to be treated with respect and thankfulness to the Lord))…but at night in in the cool of the evening when God whispers to your heart “Be still and know I am God”… You need that sweet presence of the unsurmountable peace that passes all understanding, deep within you to ” Hear the Deep call unto the deep” then you can whisper Yes Sir, I am here or Lord, I am here Sir.”
A very close study of the Bible reveals that there is indeed the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and there is the Gospel that Jesus Christ preached.
Is there a difference?
Yes.
There is the Gospel that Jesus is the Christ the Son of the Living God.
The Apostle Paul did not recognise that Jesus was the Christ, he believed those who preached Christ and Him crucified were heretics and had to be killed. Then Jesus revealed Himself to Paul on the road to Damascus and Saul became Paul, a conversion took place.
And then there is the Gospel that Jesus preached.
Luke 8
1 Soon afterward he went on through cities and villages, proclaiming and bringing the good news of the kingdom of God. And the twelve were with him,
And then there is the task Jesus gave His disciples.
Luke 9
2 and he sent them out to proclaim the kingdom of God and to heal.
So, we have the good news that the words of the prophets of old concerning the birth, ministry, death, resurrection and ascension to heaven have been fulfilled.
And there is the gospel He gave His disciples to preach – the gospel of the Kingdom of God.
And, there is the ongoing instruction to those drawn to read the Bible.
Matthew 6
33 But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.
Greater understanding is promised to those who seek first, the (gospel concerning) the Kingdom of God.
It is thought to be “nice” to carry The New Testament with you….That is 27 Books
What did you do with the Other 39 Books …..The Old Testament..????
To discard one or the other is not wise….it takes 66 Books of The Word of God for us to not to be guilt of “adding to or taking away from” His Word….with so many preachers rising up and getting a special following of people like the Pied Piper each Rewriting The Bible to explain it to fit their doctrines and some Bibles have more Explanation on the page than room for no more than 3 or 4 scriptures ….All that is ..is their personal commentaries which leaves the ” Sheep” grazing in the Field of the Wolves and not in The Word of God !
Dear Andrea
Shalom, and love in Jesus.
You wrote:
It is thought to be “nice” to carry The New Testament with you….That is 27 Books
What did you do with the Other 39 Books …..The Old Testament..????
My comment:
I do carry a full Bible with me. But even if I carry only a booklet with the Psalms or the gospel of John, I still have the Word of God with me. I do not know any Christian who are able to read the full Bible when they are travelling. Not even Hillary Clinton. To carry a full Bible can still give some of us a “feel good factor”. I do not like to leave my house without my Bible.