Israel to bring the end of the Nazism of Ahmadinejad

In private meetings, Netanyahu backs strike even if Israel can’t completely destroy Iran’s nuclear program, ‘Post’ learns.

Neo-Nazi Islamic leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is entertained in the United Nations, who pass a resolution condemning Israel every second week.

Setting Iran’s nuclear plans back a few years to buy time for regime change or other unforeseen developments would be good in its own right, even if Israel cannot completely take out Iran’s nuclear program, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said recently, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

Netanyahu, in private meetings, repeated a number of times that before Israel’s 1981 attack on Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor, the Mossad and Military Intelligence were opposed because they thought the best that could be done was to delay the program for a couple of years.

Source: Jerusalem Post

My comment:

It looks like the cabinet in Israel have finally lost patience with the empty words of men like Barack Husein Obama.

The ideology of Iran and Nazi Germany are one and the same.

Therefore it is a blunt betrayal of mankind, when Americans pump oil out of the Persian Gulf, but let the Ayatollah regime develop a nuclear bomb just next door.

Benjamin Netanyahu seems to have given the order to prepare for a massive military operation.

It would be like the USA importing oil from Poland in 1938, and not being willing to face the cruel and evil regime in Berlin.

For Israel, this is a matter of its very existence.

Since the Iranian leaders multiple times over the last decade, have promised to delete Israel:

It is time for Israel to give this Nazi-regime the same crippling blow, as Russia gave Germany in 1945.

Before Berlin fell, almost 20 million Russians had lost their life.

A third of the fallen in World War II were Russians. Less than one per cent were soldiers from the USA.

Israel must not commit the same mistake as the Russians.  From 1939 to 1941 Moscow was bound by a “peace treaty” with Adolf Hitler.

Half of the Jews of the World were slaughtered in gas chambers made by the promoted “Peace maker” Adolf Htler.

One of the fruit of an attack on Iran, will be the USA finally siding with the Ayatollah-regime.

Simply because the Iranian military protection of the Americans in the Persian gulf, keep the price of petrol low at the gas stations in America.

It will be the Jews who will be blamed for the downfall of the US economy, not the waist of two trillion US dollars on the failed wars with Iraq and Afghanistan.

Let is be.

A couple of million Jews will be lead out of the US, in a massive exodus. They will return home to Israel. All of those who are not wiling to side with yet another enemy of God and the Jewish statehood, claiming to live in “safety” from New York to San Francisco.

Let it be.

The Bible says ALL nations shall make Israel their lone enemy, when God of the Bible shall bring them all into Zion for the final judgment.  Also the people who have been deceived, to support the wicked already existing Iranian-American nexus.

 Joel 3:2
I will gather all nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. There I will enter into judgment against them concerning my inheritance, my people Israel, for they scattered my people among the nations and divided up my land.

Jesus the Messiah has been the rock of Israel in all the wars since 1948.

Let us praise Him, who will be with His re-birthed Israel to the very end off time. Let all who love the Messiah stand with Israel in her time of trouble. Amen.

Written by Ivar

15 thoughts on “Israel to bring the end of the Nazism of Ahmadinejad

  1. Ivar,
    Greetings and peace
    Israel has been between a rock and a hard place much of its existence. If and I repeat if inteligence is clear and exact. If it shows
    that Iran is about to make a bomb, then Israel must act and do what they believe is right to do based on clear,not clouded intelligence.
    If Israel acts alone and knocks out their capabilities you can be sure that Iran will get nuclear capabilities back faster than you can shake a stick. This will happen because their allies will come to their
    defense and give it to them quickly. Then the senario will be on again. Dick Cheney wrote in his memoirs that US should be careful not to make the same mistake as in the past by acting on mercky intelligence. US has to many conflicting priorities as you have so
    well spoken about. At the end of the day though she will be at Israel’s back

  2. Barack Hussein Obama is a traitor and secret Muslim.He hosted an Islamic dinner recently where he “championed the Koran!” I’m voting for Romney because today he accused Obama of abandoning Israel.

    1. Yes Brian, no one seemes to have pointed out that Obama was formerly Barry Soretoe, its common for westernised people when they convert to change their name to something islamic, examples are Casius Clay to Muhamad Ali or cat Stevens to Yusuf Islam when they convert to Islam, did barry become Barak when he converted?

  3. When will the world realize the right and wrong side of History? When will they heed Genesis 12:3? All this because Obama lusts for a second term. All he cares about is the polls taken from the mindless American’s gas pumps.

  4. Brian
    peace and greetings
    Your assessment of Barrack Obama may be correct and your choice to vote for Romney is a good one in terms of voting for the lesser of the two evils. But. I would encourage you to really look into Romney’s Life. He has absolutely stated that a Nuclear Iran is not acceptable, but Obama has said the same thing. He has shown publicly and stated his allegiance to Israel. (his allegiance should first be to the US) Romney says many good things because he wants to be elected. Be cautious of him. Obama has a track record of not aligning with Israel. He promised when he was running for president that he would. If Romney is elected it will remain to be seen if he will support Israel fully. Once and again Americans are faced with a dilema of who to vote for. Personally I don’t think Romney is any better.

  5. Folks can somebody advise me here, With regard to Zechariahs word about half the city going into captivity etc etc, does that indicate that Jerusalem will be captured by the enemy , what exactly does that verse apply to ? Any views would be appreciated.

    1. Tommy
      Most everyone on this blog will disagree but I will tell you what I think. I accept this prophecy of Zech to mean the capturing of Jerusalem in his future but not ours. He was prophecying of the coming capturing of Jerusalem which I believe took place in 70 A.D. That was his future. When Jesus foretold of this in Matt 24
      What we call the Oivet Discourse he prophesies that 2 men would be out in the field, one would be taken and the other left.
      Two women will be grinding with a hand mill, one will be taken and the other left. If you read the historian Josephus in his account of the great Jewish war which happened between approximately A.D. 65-A.D. 70 he said that half of the Jewish people were taken into captivity and the othe half were left dead
      This seems to fit into Zechs prophecy. Probably most will disagree. The best thing is to study and decide for yourself

      1. Todd mate, thanks for that, interesting stuff, I have the full works of Joe so will have a butchers at that. It sounds plausible what you say, I find it hard to believe that Jerusalem, at least half of it will go into enemy hands again unless by a peace treaty the so called East Jerusalem but the verse makes it sound like its taken by force during some kind of barney. Thanks for you tip, really appreciate it geez.

      2. Doesn’t add up that way for me. 70AD from what I read was the Romans putting down a Jewish rebellion. Zacharia 14 prophecy seems much bigger, like the events of the very end, the second coming. And maybe there’s something to that Zombie Apocalypse stuff.

        zech 14:2 This is the plague with which the LORD will strike all the nations that fought against Jerusalem: Their flesh will rot while they are still standing on their feet, their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongues will rot in their mouths. On that day men will be stricken by the LORD with great panic. Each man will seize the hand of another, and they will attack each other.

      3. If you read the historian Josephus, all the things Zech describes occurred. He writes of men and women impaled by swords whose body rested upright leaning on it and he describes their eyes rooting in their sockets. The key to understanding this prophecy is Jerusalem. Who fought against Jerusalem and who or what is Jerusalem. Seek the Lord Jesus for understanding, for it is he that wrote the prophecy.

      4. Based on the article about Josephus he seemed to be a traitor who was paid handsomely. He suggested a means of suicide for his comrades by killing each other, but he himself lived since nobody was left to kill him. And later couldn’t seem to keep a wife very long, even being filthy rich (which could indicate he wasn’t a very nice guy or that Jewish women knew he was a traitor and dispised him) but he kept remarrying. He does not sound like someone whos testimony can be trusted.

  6. Yes. What you have written about Josephus I have read also on wikipedia. Many preachers refer to his historical record though because it is history of that time written by a Jew. I have observed that when his writings prove fulfillment of scripture then futurist often discredit him. Anyway, either one believes things happened or they believe they are yet to take place. Futurism or preterism. Surprising though many who claim not to be preterist are actually preterist to a certain degree.

    1. Well I dont want to be lumped into a stereotype over such a vague passage so I think Im done with this one. But obviously if you look at the scriptures as a whole there is more to come.

    2. Todd said:

      “Anyway, either one believes things happened or they believe they are yet to take place.”

      My reply:

      I don’t agree with your interpretation. In order to understand the prophecies in Zechariah, the concept of double reference (not double fulfillment which is a wrong principle) should be observed. A passage may speak of two people or two events that are separated by a period of time.

      Chapters 9-12 contain two prophetic messages. The first is about Messiah’s FIRST COMING and the second message is about Messiah’s SECOND COMING (not to be confused with the Rapture which is prior to the Second Coming), victory, and deliverance of Israel. Walk Through/Zechariah-briefing.htm

  7. JM
    Thank you for your reply
    I will read and study those chapters again with the idea of double reference in mind.
    Thanks again

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s