Exiled Iranian prince urges Israel not to attack

“Don’t bomb Teheran, but rather support the opposition”.

The prince of Persia wants his kingdom back. Regardless if Israel will face a nuclear Holocaust.

These are the words of Prince Reza Pahlavi. He is the exiled son of the late Iranian leader, Shah Reza Pahlavi.

The Iranian prince gave his public statement to Israel’s Channel 10 TV on Monday.

Reza Pahlavi underline that a military attack on the Islamic Republic’s renegade nuclear program would help the regime in Teheran more than hurt it.

But Israel could help topple that regime and usher in a better future for both countries by assisting the domestic opposition.

“The best thing you can do for the regime is to tell that ‘we are going to attack you,’ or in fact attack you,” he said.

“You will be giving Khamenei and all his clique, when they have no answers anymore to the country’s ills, the greatest gift of all by doing that. That is just crazy. That just doesn’t make sense. The best option is to utilize the best army in the world in place ready to strike, which is the Iranian people themselves. And if you don’t help that, God help us all.”

Source: ICEJ.org

My comment:

I cant help thinking that the exiled prince of Persia wants his empire back. Not bombed.

He could care care less about the Jewish people, and the possibility of another Holocaust.

Israel must not listen to this powerless leader, who have hardly any support in Iran. His father was a notorious dictator, who tortured Iranians. The Shah of Iran has to take much of the blame for the Islamic Revolution. If He had ruled with justice, there might not have been a totalitarian dictatorship in Tehran today.

Written by Ivar

Sharia in the UK force ban on Israeli ad

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has banned a press ad displaying the Golan Heights as part of the state of Israel.

True map of Israel is banned in the UK.

The ad, which also promoted a book about Northern Israel, ran in November and attracted 350 complaints from members of the public and bodies such as 1948 Lest We Forget, Friends of Al Aqsa, and Jews for Justice for Palestinians.

It included a map which showed dotted lines around the Golan Heights area, labelled “Golan”, the Gaza Strip, labelled “Gaza”, and the West Bank. The northern and southern parts of the West Bank were labelled “Samaria” and “Judea”.

The vast majority of complaints challenged that the ad misleadingly implied that the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and the Golan Heights were internationally recognised as part of Israel.

The Israeli Government Tourist Office, which ran the ad, said the map was not intended as a political map and did not include the word “Israel”, apart from the heading.

It believed British travellers “would be aware of the varying views as to the status” of the areas and said for that reason, it sought to avoid confusion by distinguishing those areas on the map.

It claimed “a bold, broken, black line” identified the Golan Heights and acknowledged the political controversies in that area.
The ASA noted that the map appeared beneath the heading “Welcome to Northern Israel” and that the context implied all of the areas featured on the map were part of the state of Israel.

It also noted the border lines shown for the Gaza Strip, Golan Heights and the West Bank were faintly produced and difficult to distinguish on the map itself.

It agreed the ad misleadingly implied those territories were part of the state of Israel and ruled the ad should not be shown again in its current form.

According to Souk 360, the map was removed from the ad after it came to light there had been complaints.
The Israeli Government Tourist Office was unavailable for comment.

Source: Campaignlive.co.uk

My comment:

It is amazing that the United Kingdom support the Syrian claim to the Golan Heights. Is was not a part of the France Mandate, who established Syria in 1946 and later Lebanon.

The Golan Heights were not a part of Syria when France negotiated a treaty of independence in September 1936. Nor when it got its independence from British protection First of January 1944.

Syria invaded the Golan Heights in 1948, is a Pan-Arabian bid to the destroy the new born state of Israel.

From the Golan Heights, the Syrian army continued to fire rockets and mortars into the Galilee.

Why would Syria do this, if it was not because they wanted to destroy the whole of Israel?

The Syrian occupation ended in 1967, when this area was liberated.

Why to the UK want to give the Syrians what has never been theirs?

Written by Ivar.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑