Anti-Christ banned from ruling by proxy in The Commonwealth

The Monarch of United Kingdom can not be a Catholic, but must be a member of the Church of England.  

The Queen would have to leave the throne, if she converted to Catholicism.

Changes to the 300-year-old succession laws have been branded a “missed opportunity” after stopping short of allowing a Catholic to accede to the throne.

Under the reforms outlined yesterday, primogeniture was scrapped to allow sons and daughters of any future monarch to have equal right to the throne. The Act of Settlement was further amended so that heirs to the throne could marry Catholics, but the ban on Catholics becoming sovereign remains in place.

The changes, announced at the Commonwealth leaders summit in Perth, Australia, means that Prince William’s first child will follow him to the throne whether it is a boy or a girl. But any king or queen would still have to be a member of the Church of England.

Source: The Scotsman

My comment:

The battle for Britain is not over.  The enemies of freedom and democracy wants to end the laws that protects the throne from being captured by a Muslim or any other pagan. The United Kingdom and The Commonwealth shall continued to be ruled by a Christian.

People who promote universal laws do not know what they are doing. If they are enforced in the UK, the Kingdom can be ruled by a Hindu, Buddhist or Catholic.  That would be the end of the Christian reign, in the reformed protestant world.

 2 John 1:7
I say this because many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist.

Martin Luther called the Pope and anti-Christ.  It is honorable that the British Commonwealth can not become subjects of the “Holy See”, He and his followers are still banned from ruling Britannia.

Written by Ivar

3 thoughts on “Anti-Christ banned from ruling by proxy in The Commonwealth

  1. The truth of the matter is this: it is disputed that the amendment is even valid as the monarch is no longer valid according to the act of Settlement which is also still legally binding on all not just the queen. You can acess it here

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Will3/12-13/2/contents

    section 1 of it forbids not only catholics from taking to the throne but also a crowned protestant monarch from reconciling with the church of Rome ( pope , Catholic church) if they do they are to abidcate and all citizens are absolved of all allegiances with such a monarch,( from lines 8 downwards here :http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Will3/12-13/2/section/I)

    I like others have lobbied the govt/privvy council to do the right thing: cause the queen to abdicate and the laws that she passed annulled as the law states that she does not have any regal power whilst dis qualified. As a christian she is not just the head of the anglican church i.e a figure head , but is actually a christian herself she is expected to obey the laws of the land (romans 13 v1-7) otherwise face eternal fire…true. the applicable law here is the act of settlement which applies to the queen and all citizens.

    weird but true.

  2. sorry the queen first reconciled with the popein 1961 -Pope John at the Vatican.
    If christians are to obey the laws of the land then it is true that the queen must also obey the laws that govern her -the act of settlement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s