Obama defends killing of Muslims in Asia but praises the «Great religion of Islam»

Muslims who kill in the name of God are not representatives for the great religion of Islam.

alg_barack_obama_side_view — Barack Obama believes in an Islamic religion of his own imagination.

This is words of Barack Hussein Obama, expressed in his Nobel Peace Price address in Oslo on December 10th.

Obama rebuked men who kills in the name of Islam and in the name of God.

«Most dangerously, we see it in the way that religion is used to justify the murder of innocents by those who have distorted and defiled the great religion of Islam, and who attacked my country from Afghanistan»

The same Obama who attacked killing in the name of God, defended killing in the name of America, or in the name of morality. In good old cowboy style, Obama feels he has the right to kill the «bad guys». People who do not agree with him. Just like the US did in Vietnam.

Obama also spoke about the «righteous war», when he received the Nobel Peace prize in Oslo. The US President is leading a Super Power that fights two wars in Muslim nations in Asia. The peace price winner is also a promoter of sending 30.000 more NATO-soldiers into Afghanistan.

Source: Mike Adams, researcher.

Again Barack Hussein Obama spoke about the great religion of Islam. His definition of this great religion, makes him a good Muslim. Because only true Muslims will be able to call this religion «great».

PH2009121001773 — Obama is the first man who give thanks for a peace price by sending 30.000 more soldiers into a war that has lasted longer than World War II

So what is this great religion of Islam, to a man like Obama.

Is it the great religion of Saudi Arabia, who use Sharia laws to chop hands of people who commit sins?

Is it the great religion of the Ayatollah, who execute homosexuals?

Is it Islam as explained in the Jihad verses in the Koran, that demand faithful Muslims to kill and slaughter people who refuse to submit to Allah and his prophet Muhammad?

Well and good: Obama refuses to acknowledge killings in the name of Islam. But how can educated people, applaud a US President who in the very next sentences justify his own killings of Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Obama is either a «Muslim» who have invented an Islamic religion of his own imagination, or he is a complete fool. That people buy his sweetness and flattery talks makes them equally wicked.

December 11, 2009 0

Mike`s corner: «It’s now official: War is Peace»

The Norwegian press have been preoccupied with how much of Obama’s Peace Prize lecture was geared toward war rather than peace.

In one and the same newspaper two commentators differed on how many times the word “war” versus the word “peace” was mentioned. It turns out that “war” won 35 (or 44) to 29 (or 30).

Obama was, as a matter of fact, the very personification of Minitrue (newspeak for Ministry of Truth) with its slogan “War is Peace” cf. George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four”. Obama maintained that all nations have an obligation to “think in new ways about the notions of just war and the imperatives of a just peace”. He assured his audience that the USA would continue to abide by the Geneva Conventions. But this had a hollow ring to it.

Obama stated the obvious when pointing out that Hitler could not have been stopped by using non-violence. That applied also to al-Qaida today. Obama called on the international community to insist that Iran not “game the system” by procuring nuclear weapons. But no mention was given to Hamas and use conventional weapons supplied to them by Iran to terrorise southern Israel as amply testified to by Sderot Media Center.

“Those who seek peace cannot stand idly by as nations arm themselves for nuclear war”, Obama reasoned without naming names. One might like to interpret this as a green light for peace-seeking Israel to eliminate the nuclear threat in the Middle East. Who else is going to do the dirty work?

Obama made his way messianically through a rhetorical minefield. The idealistic core of the speech came toward the end when Obama spoke about the explosive combination of fear and religion. Losing one’s religion, and thereby one’s identity, was something to be guarded against. To Obama it felt as if things were “moving backwards” in the Middle East. He meant to say Israel, since he in his next breath mentioned first the Arabs and then the Jews. To Obama it all seemed something belonging to the realm of a tribal war.

After this he hailed Islam as “the great religion”. He said that the extremist attacks on the USA were a warped form of religion. And here he threw in the Crusades for good measure, saying in effect that Islam and Christianity were just as bad when wars were deemed as “Holy”. At the end of this particular sequence he made it sound as if The Golden Rule was an integral part of Islam as well as other major religions.

The purpose of faith and the concept of peace were totally dependent on the need for restraint, said Obama as he made it to safe ground by going on to quote another black prize winner with dreams, Dr. Martin Luther King: “I refuse to accept despair as the final response to the ambiguities of history”. Finally, Obama wanted to make it quite clear to the one thousand attending the event in Oslo’s town hall that “there will be war” and peace was something worth fighting for.

By Mike Adams:

Guest writer

December 11, 2009 0

«Viva Palestine» raise money for suicide bombers and Hamas in the US

The Viva Palestina USA group do not only raise support for the population of Gaza, but for its Hamas rulers as well.

congressmann-brad-sherman-copy — Brad Sherman ring the alarm bell on American money being collected to support Islamic suicide bombers.

This is the claim from Congressman Brad Sherman (D-CA) in a letter to US Attorney General Eric Holder. The Attorney General is being urged to launch an investigation into whether or not a new pro-Palestinian charity is raising funds on American university campuses that will eventually end up in Hamas’ pockets.

Sherman noted that Viva Palestina USA was founded by British lawmaker George Galloway, and was modeled after his British-based charity Viva Palestina.

In their first visit to Gaza in March, Galloway and other Viva Palestina representatives gave medical supplies to Gaza hospitals, but also met with and voiced their support for Hamas leaders. According to a report at the time, Galloway held up a bag of cash, declared that it was not charity, but politics, and handed it to Hamas officials.

When Viva Palestina USA first visited Gaza several months later, it avoided outright political statements, but Sherman and other pro-Israel figures in the US insist the spirit and intentions remain the same.

If true, that could cause legal problems for the group, which started raising fund on the campus of the University of California, Irvine during the summer. It if a federal crime to raise money in the US that may end up in the hands of recognized terror groups.

Source: Israeli magazine, Israel Today.

December 11, 2009 0

Jews only to give up Golan and East Jerusalem in referendum

The politicians in Israel can not surrender the Golan Hight´s or East Jerusalem. A new law demands a majority vote from the people in a referendum.

2559943759_a5996fe108 — Magan David will reign in East Jerusalem, as long as the Jewish people keeps on supporting Biblical Zionism.

The Knesset’s decision on Wednesday to advance a bill calling for a referendum on the withdrawal from parts of Israel’s territories as part of future peace deals was received with much satisfaction in the Golan Heights.

Uri Heitner of Kibbutz Ortal in the Golan said:

«It is sad that a law on approving concessions of sovereign territory via a referendum must be put in the State of Israel’s law book, but this is our reality».

On the decision’s repercussions on a future peace treaty with Syria, Heitner said, «Syria to me is like a groom who wants to get married, and tells the bride that if she doesn’t marry him, he will murder her».

There are some 2,200 zimmers and guest houses that employ hundreds of residents of the Golan, and many others work in private tourist sites, which belong to the Nature and Parks Authority and the Jewish National Fund.

Sixty-eight Knesset members voted in favor of the motion, 22 opposed, and one MK abstained. Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who had declared his objection to the bill, voted in favor.

Source: Ynet.news.

My comment:

The «Golan and East Jerusalem bill» is a move to counter the International community voting in favor of an Islam takeover of Jewish land, and the liberated capital of Israel, the city of Jerusalem.

This victory for Biblical Zionism can only be sustained as long as the majority of Israelis stays committed Zionists.

The problem with such a bill, is that media will now put a different pressure on the Government of Israel. A series of cleverly invented opinion polls, will display that the «Jewish people» are willing to give up more land for peace.

The state of Israel can not survive on the shifting winds of public opinion. It can only exist with the support of God of Israel.

The moment the majority of the Jews says the Word of God, the covenant between the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and His chosen people is no longer valid, the legitimacy of the state of israel it self has been made null and void.

This is the coming tragedy of our time. That International pressure will make the Jews chose the false peace, rather than to trust in God of the Bible.

December 11, 2009 0