Seriously flawed: CNN’s Fareed Zakaria on Winston Churchill and Israel

July 10, 2010

Watch out for this man. He walks in deception, and falsification of World History.

Faydeen Zakria is a Muslim from Mumbai, who misguides the American people.

Investigative Journalism

In the Magazine Newsweek, CNN’s Fareed Zakaria called support for Biblical Jewish settlements in Samaria and Judea:

“subordinated petty domestic considerations”.

Read his comment in Newsweek.

Zakaria is a Indian born Muslim, who nine years ago got his Green Card in the US.  In the same comment, the CNN talk show host and GPS program anchor, falsified the US-British modern history, and the role of Winston Churchill in the build up to World War II.

Lets take a deeper look of what Zakaria said, when he compared Benjamin Netanyahu with Winston Churchill:

“Bibi likes to think of himself as Winston Churchill, warning the world of a gathering storm. But he should bear in mind that Churchill’s single obsession during the late 1930s was to strengthen his alliance with the United States, whatever the costs, concessions, and compromises he had to make” .

This is simply not true. Winston Churchill was not supporting the US policy of isolationism, and made no compromise. Churchill rather provoked the US to stand up against Nazism already in 1931, even before the Nazi-party had come to power. The US did not change their policy before the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941.

This political line of Winston Churchill is the political line of Benjamin Netanyahu. The Prime Minister of Israel provokes the US not to accept the Islamic “peace plan” for the Middle East, and Netanyahu requests Obama not to compromise the security of Israel.  That is not making Bibi popular in Washington, and certainly not with this semi-Muslim in the White House.

Let see what The Churchill Center is saying about the matter.

In 1931 Churchill visited the United States on a lecture tour that addressed the relationship of the English-American people. When he returned to Great Britain he continued to “woo” America so as to soften their isolationist stance in regards to world affairs and especially to the threat of Nazism.

A major theme in many of Churchill’s speeches and magazine articles during this period was the importance of the United States in joining England in subjugating the tyrannical governments of the world.

Lesson Plan by Robert B. Patrick. The Churchill Centre:

Winston Churchill warned the US about Nazism before the Nazi has been lifted to power in Germany. Israel gave US the same warnings, even before Hamas came to power in Gaza. Radical Islam and Nazism. Two sides of the same coin. Both funded on Jew-hate and the bid to destroy the Jewish people.

When Fareed Zakaria in March 2010 uses the example of Winston Churchill in a bid to mock the Prime Minister of Israel, He also overlooked that President Obama do not want to have “a Churchill” in his own office. On of the first thing Barack Hussein Obama removed from the oval office, was a gift from United Kingdom. A bust of Winston Churchill.

Bush receive Churchill in the oval office in the year 2001. Obama threw him out. Above Churchill: British ambassador Christopher Meyer.

Why did Obama do that?

Lets see what the UK Newspaper “The Telegraph”, can add of information about Obamas reaction:

“Churchill has less happy connotations for Mr Obama than those American politicians who celebrate his wartime leadership. It was during Churchill’s second premiership that Britain suppressed Kenya’s Mau Mau rebellion. Among Kenyans allegedly tortured by the colonial regime included one Hussein Onyango Obama, the President’s grandfather”.

(end of News report).

So completely contrary to Fareed Zakaria’ s historical knowledge and his political viewpoint:

Obama has no regards for the US-British war time relations, Zakaria feels Benjamin Netanyahu has neglected in his relationship with Obama.

Fareed Zakaria is a very dangerous deceiver of the American people. He might soon be promoted in CNN, to create a replacement of “Larry King Live”. If so, the Americans and a global audience will be listening to the falsehoods of this reporter every day.

Read more about Winston Churchill’s fight against the Nazis.


London’s Ambassador in Lebanon praises Hizb’Allah

July 10, 2010

The UK Government has labeled Hizb”Allah as a terrorist organization. But their own Ambassador in Beirut, is a fan of their late Islamic spiritual head.

The UK Ambassador Frances Guy in Beirut submits to Sharia law, while adoring the spiritial head of Hizb"Allah, Shiite leader Sayyed Muhammed Hussein Fadlallah,

A day after Middle East Senior Editor Octavia Nash was fired at CNN, the UK Government is exposed for its support for Hizb’Allah.

Officially London has labeled the Lebanese bases terrorist organization as en enemy of freedom and peace. But in secret, the British Ambassador Frances Guy endorse and admire Hizb’Allah’s spiritual leader.

This is an extreme form of double faceed Foreign policy, that amounts to treason.

Britain’s ambassador to Beirut posted on her blog on Monday, under the headline “The passing of decent men”. She said Fadlallah was the politician in Lebanon she had enjoyed meeting most.

Former British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and British Ambassador to Lebanon Frances Guy leave the government palace in Beirut

When you visited him you could be sure of a real debate, a respectful argument and you knew you would leave his presence feeling a better person.

That for me is the real effect of a true man of religion; leaving an impact on everyone he meets, no matter what their faith.

Sheikh Fadlallah passed away yesterday.

Lebanon is a lesser place the day after but his absence will be felt well beyond Lebanon’s shores.”

Guy said she felt lucky having had the opportunity to meet Fadlallah.

“The world needs more men like him willing to reach out across faiths, acknowledging the reality of the modern world and daring to confront old constraints. May he rest in peace,” she wrote.

Guy’s post of a tribute to the man who strongly influenced Hizb’Allah, praised and endorsed suicide attacks inside Israel. He has in public said Zionists “inflated” the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust “beyond imagination”. This Lebanon Muslim scholar was on the US terrorist blacklist.

“Sheikh Fadlallah was behind hostage-taking, suicide bombings and other sorts of wanton violence, but Ambassador Guy said he was a man of peace, and Ambassador Guy is an honorable woman,” quipped Israeli Foreign ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor.

Source: The Jerusalem Post.

My comment:

Who do they think they are fooling?

I guess a lot of people, who watch reality shows on their TV every day. Millions do not pay attention to the grave hypocrisy and security lapses of their own political leaders. Its Biblical. Jesus warned us, that betrayal will be fruits of the last days.

Matthew 24:10.
At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other.

Also the Jewish Apostle Paul explained that there will be terrible times in the last day:

2 Timothy 3:1-5

But mark this:

There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with them.


Anti-Jewish Norwegian TV-reporter is a Church going Catholic

July 10, 2010

Sidsel Wold did falsify a story on Jewish professor Manfred Gerstenfeld. To the state owned media NRK she revels her self to be a believing Catholic.

Sidsel Wold is not a leftist, but a beliving Catholic working in Jerusalem

Most Norwegian viewers of the state owned TV-Channel NRK, live under the impression that journalist Sidsel Wold is a leftist supporter of The Arab Palestinians, and that her political views make her reporting with bias against Israel.

Last month, Wold was reprimanded by her editor in NRK. She had falsified a news story on Jewish professor Manfred Gerstenfeld, and his latest book on anti-semitism in Norway.

Professor Gerstenfeld hardly got a chance to speak about his own book.

In a three minutes radio-cut, Wold only expressed her views as a journalist. Another NRK-reporter later had to make a second interview, which gave Gerstenfeld as chance to express his views.

But who is this reporter Sidsel Wold, who reports from the Middle East?

Lets see what she said about her self, to a NRK journalist two years ago:

“To be the Prime Minister of Israel must be the most difficult job in the World”, explains Wold.  Her stay in Israel has made her more aware of her own identity as a Christian.

“During the worst media storms, I am likely to seek silence and peace inside the Church of the Holy Sepulchre”.

Source: NRK

My comment:

This is a stunning revelation about reporter Sidsel World. The journalist from the Lutheran kingdom of Norway, reloads her spiritual battery inside the holiest Catholic site in Jerusalem.

People who are true Christians, acknowledge that this Catholic site in a hoax, and not holy at all. This Church is rather the epic center of religious people fighting tooth and nail for what they claim is the grave yard of Jesus.

Take look at this video, of how Catholic clergy behave inside this claimed to be a Church.

Even if Jesus ever came to that site, He is longer there. He is risen.

Many Evangelical Christians believe this is the site where Jesus was crucified, buried and from where He resurrected.


“Aid ship” sent to destination without a sea port

July 10, 2010

‘If we cannot deliver the aid, we will let (Israel) deliver it,’ says head volunteer.

Libya sends this ship with "aid" to Hamas in Gaza, that do not have a sea port.

Journey of a vessel commissioned by Gaddafi charity organization expected to take up to 80 hours. The Ship will carry 2,000 tons of food and medical supplies, including sacks of rice and sugar, corn oil and olive paste.

Source: Associated Press

My comment:

Gaza has no sea port.  So why do Arabic nations sends “aid ships” to help Hamas in Gaza?

It is strange that an area claimed to have a right to form a “statehood”, does not have a sea port.

Neither the Turks, the Britishers nor the Egyptians build a sea port in Gaza. They controlled this “statehood” from 1517 A.D to 1967 A.D.

They had 450 years to deliver.

Hamas have never said their aim is to create a statehood in Gaza. They want Gaza and Israel to become integrated parts of a new Islamic statehood of “Palestine”. I guess that’s why they have never build, or plan to build a sea port on Gaza. They do not need it.

What about making the Israeli sea ports of Ashdod or Haifa “Islamic”?

I guess you just have to send 2.000 well armed “aid ships”?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 833 other followers